mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/Research-Stack.git
synced 2026-07-31 03:05:21 +00:00
Add common-noise MFG Riccati gate documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
c447e0373e
commit
0c1f4112a1
1 changed files with 122 additions and 0 deletions
122
6-Documentation/famm/COMMON_NOISE_MFG_RICCATI_GATE.md
Normal file
122
6-Documentation/famm/COMMON_NOISE_MFG_RICCATI_GATE.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
|
|||
# Common-Noise Mean-Field Game Riccati Gate
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Integrate **Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games with Common Noise: A Direct Approach** into the FAMM/Semantic Mass shortcut stack.
|
||||
|
||||
The paper is useful because it gives a mathematically mature version of a move the project keeps making:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
many coupled local actors
|
||||
→ shared global field / common noise
|
||||
→ population-limit law
|
||||
→ reduced Riccati control kernel
|
||||
→ decentralized strategy
|
||||
→ bounded residual receipt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Source
|
||||
|
||||
- Wenyu Cong, Jingtao Shi, Bingchang Wang.
|
||||
- `Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games with Common Noise: A Direct Approach`.
|
||||
- arXiv:2508.07271.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why it matters
|
||||
|
||||
The paper studies a linear-quadratic mean-field game with common noise where drift and diffusion terms are coupled with state, control, and mean-field state terms. It starts from a finite `N`-player game, derives FBSDEs by variational analysis, then takes the limit as `N → ∞` using law-of-large-numbers reasoning. In the limiting system, existence/uniqueness of BSDEs makes some variables identically zero, reducing the analysis enough to construct decentralized strategies with two Riccati equations. The paper also proves the constructed decentralized strategies form an `epsilon`-Nash equilibrium.
|
||||
|
||||
## FAMM interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
Common noise is a closure warning:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
if all agents share a shock,
|
||||
the shock is part of the system boundary.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The route object is not one local agent. It is the agent plus the population field plus the common-noise channel.
|
||||
|
||||
## FAMM object
|
||||
|
||||
```math
|
||||
\mathfrak C_{\mathrm{MFG}}
|
||||
=
|
||||
A_{16}(u_{\mathrm{mfg}})
|
||||
\otimes
|
||||
[
|
||||
\Sigma_{\mathrm{agent}}
|
||||
+
|
||||
\Sigma_{\mathrm{mean}}
|
||||
+
|
||||
\Sigma_{\mathrm{common}}
|
||||
+
|
||||
\Sigma_{\mathrm{FBSDE}}
|
||||
+
|
||||
\Sigma_{\mathrm{Riccati}}
|
||||
+
|
||||
\Sigma_{\epsilon\mathrm{Nash}}
|
||||
+
|
||||
\epsilon_{\mathrm{solv}}
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Semantic Mass lanes
|
||||
|
||||
```math
|
||||
\mu_{\mathrm{MFG}}[k]
|
||||
=
|
||||
w_m\|m_k\|
|
||||
+
|
||||
w_0\|W^0_k\|
|
||||
+
|
||||
w_u\|u_k\|
|
||||
+
|
||||
w_q J_k
|
||||
+
|
||||
w_r\|R_k\|
|
||||
+
|
||||
w_e\epsilon_{\mathrm{Nash},k}
|
||||
+
|
||||
w_s S_k
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Where:
|
||||
|
||||
- `m_k` = population / mean-field state.
|
||||
- `W0_k` = common-noise shock lane.
|
||||
- `u_k` = decentralized control intensity.
|
||||
- `J_k` = cost/value lane.
|
||||
- `R_k` = FBSDE/Riccati residual.
|
||||
- `epsilon_Nash,k` = bounded equilibrium error.
|
||||
- `S_k` = solvability/stability status.
|
||||
|
||||
## 16D anchor addition
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
COMMON_NOISE_MFG_RICCATI_GATE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended axis placement:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
2 semantic mass population-state pressure
|
||||
3 Z pole mean-field trajectory recurrence
|
||||
4 curvature Riccati/value curvature
|
||||
5 delta-memory population state as compact history
|
||||
6 closure common-noise boundary inclusion
|
||||
7 residual seal epsilon-Nash residual
|
||||
11 scar failed coupling / unsolved FBSDE route
|
||||
13 invariant equilibrium consistency
|
||||
14 receipt Riccati/epsilon-Nash receipt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Shortcut doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
do not enumerate every strategic interaction
|
||||
when the population-limit field plus Riccati kernel carries the lawful structure.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## No-drift boundary
|
||||
|
||||
This is a mathematical control/routing witness. It does not prove project-level claims by itself. It gives a rigorous shortcut pattern: common-noise closure, population-limit collapse, Riccati kernel, decentralized strategy, and bounded equilibrium residual.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue