mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/Research-Stack.git
synced 2026-08-11 18:10:34 +00:00
docs(wiki): disambiguate continuation receipt instructions
Split the run-on sentence that read 'Continuation receipts omit context_files and message_keys records the alternate shape...' into two distinct clauses so agents following the 'Adding a New Review' checklist don't misread it as 'omit [context_files and message_keys]'. Explicitly state that continuation receipts MUST populate message_keys to record the alternate response shape.
This commit is contained in:
parent
04e3b7063a
commit
73772151bd
1 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -196,9 +196,11 @@ When emitting new review artifacts:
|
||||||
different Anthropic-compatible schema.
|
different Anthropic-compatible schema.
|
||||||
3. Populate `context_files` with repo-relative paths to every file consumed
|
3. Populate `context_files` with repo-relative paths to every file consumed
|
||||||
by the prompt so future agents can reproduce the prompt body. Continuation
|
by the prompt so future agents can reproduce the prompt body. Continuation
|
||||||
receipts omit `context_files` and `message_keys` records the alternate
|
receipts omit `context_files`. Continuation receipts MUST populate
|
||||||
shape of the continuation response; consumers reconstruct continuation
|
`message_keys` to record the alternate shape of the continuation response
|
||||||
context via the primary receipt indexed by `previous_answer_path` (see
|
(e.g. `["role", "content", "reasoning"]`). Consumers reconstruct
|
||||||
|
continuation context via the primary receipt indexed by
|
||||||
|
`previous_answer_path` (see
|
||||||
[[#Reconstructing context for continuations]] above).
|
[[#Reconstructing context for continuations]] above).
|
||||||
4. Record `prompt_sha256` and `answer_sha256` for integrity verification.
|
4. Record `prompt_sha256` and `answer_sha256` for integrity verification.
|
||||||
5. Commit the answer and receipt together — the receipt is meaningless
|
5. Commit the answer and receipt together — the receipt is meaningless
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue