# FSDU Solver Mode Atlas Status: `CANDIDATE_SOLVER_BASIS` Claim boundary: this is a solver-mode atlas for the FAMM Scar Differential Update surface. It is not a claim that every algorithm has been implemented, benchmarked, or proven equivalent. It defines how traversal algorithms enter the adaptive mixture as bounded projection modes. Theory anchor: ```text 2-Search-Space/FAMM/docs/FSDU_theory.md ``` Lean anchor: ```text 2-Search-Space/FAMM/FAMM_FSDU.lean ``` ## Core Fixture Modes The current finite Lean fixture uses nine modes: | Mode | Geometry | Use | Scar risk | |---|---|---|---| | A* | cost plus goal curvature | admissible heuristic route | stale heuristic | | Dijkstra | isotropic cost relaxation | weighted graph baseline | expensive wavefront | | Greedy Best-First | goal attractor collapse | fast scout | false attractor | | BFS | expanding wavefront | unweighted reachability | frontier blow-up | | DFS | tunneling strand | narrow/deep passage | dead-end depth | | Bidirectional BFS | two-front closure | known start and goal | midpoint mismatch | | Weighted A* | inflated heuristic | speed-biased route | suboptimality debt | | Recursive Backtrack | constructive DFS with rollback | local exhaustive structure | oscillation | | Wall Follower | boundary contour trace | embodied/local wall navigation | loop/island trap | ## Extended Atlas Additional modes can be lowered into the finite basis until they earn their own formal field. | Family | Examples | Initial lowering | |---|---|---| | bounded-memory heuristic | IDA*, RBFS, SMA* | A* + DFS | | bounded-width heuristic | Beam Search, Fringe Search | Greedy + Weighted A* | | incremental replanning | LPA*, D*, D* Lite, ARA* | A* + scar repair sidecar | | line-of-sight | Theta*, Lazy Theta*, Any-angle A* | A* + ray shortcut sidecar | | grid acceleration | Jump Point Search, HPA* | A* + cached symmetry sidecar | | weighted relaxation | Bellman-Ford, Johnson, Floyd-Warshall | Dijkstra + baseline map | | continuous sampling | RRT, RRT*, PRM, BIT* | DFS + random scout sidecar | | local embodied | Bug algorithms, potential fields | Wall Follower + Greedy | | stochastic/metaheuristic | ant colony, simulated annealing, tabu, genetic | Greedy + FAMM exploration | | game/tree search | MCTS, minimax, alpha-beta | DFS + receipt branching | | retrieval graph | HNSW, ANN walks, learned heuristics | Greedy + Dijkstra | ## Admission Rule Each new mode needs: ```text selection law Q_m(v) weight-increase alert weight-decrease alert scar type it tends to create receipt shape for committed segments negative control or failure case ``` If those are missing, the mode remains an atlas note rather than a formal field. ## FSDU Control Law ```text X_t = (M_a, M_b, S_a, S_b, Theta) DeltaS_t = S_a - S_b commit allowed iff ||DeltaS_t|| <= epsilon ``` The solver atlas only changes `Theta`. It does not change the commitment rule. ## Keeper Distinction Classic pathfinding asks: ```text which algorithm finds the best path on this graph? ``` FSDU asks: ```text which mixture keeps speculative and committed scars bounded while the graph itself may be changing? ``` That is the important expansion. The algorithm name is not the truth source. The replay receipt and bounded scar differential are.