Research-Stack/6-Documentation/tiddlywiki-local/wiki/tiddlers/Witness-Regularized Burgers GPE.tid
Brandon Schneider 0cf775c80e collapse: prover orchestration layers, FAMM verilator harness, swarm topological prober, spec sheets, virtual FPGA system tests, merge conflict resolution
- Prover-Integrated Orchestration Layers (L0-L3): Goedel-Prover-V2 watchdog, BFS-Prover-V2 swarm consensus, bf4prover topology adaptation
- FAMM Verilator benchmark: uniform vs preshaped delay comparison (4.4x speedup)
- Swarm topological device prober: 11 agents probing traces, caps, delays, errors, vias, PDN
- Spec sheet puller: 10 components with key params and topological relevance
- Virtual FPGA system tests: 6/6 passed, 134K ops/s throughput
- Fixed merge conflicts in AI-Newton test_experiment.ipynb
2026-05-06 23:42:01 -05:00

31 lines
864 B
Text

created: 20260506152500000
modified: 20260506152500000
tags: ResearchStack Burgers GPE ProofTarget Candidate
title: Witness-Regularized Burgers GPE
type: text/vnd.tiddlywiki
! Witness-Regularized Burgers GPE
A toy-formal equation surface combining Burgers/GPE-style dynamics with
explicit witness regularization and claim boundaries.
!! Why It Matters
This is the sane way to keep the hyperfluid/mathholes thread: formal toy
module first, physical interpretation later, and only after receipts.
!! Evidence
* Source: `shared-data/data/ingested/chatgpt/mathholes_ene_brief.md:41`
* Lane: [[Deep Mining Pass 2026-05-06]]
!! Status
HOLD as a toy formal target. Needs equation inventory, assumptions, and
validation surfaces before physical claims.
!! Links
* [[FNWH Hyperfluid Claim Boundary]]
* [[Mass Number Recursion Warning]]
* [[Soliton N-Space Path]]