mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/Research-Stack.git
synced 2026-07-31 03:05:21 +00:00
278 lines
12 KiB
Python
278 lines
12 KiB
Python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
"""
|
|
DIRECTIVE: NO ASSUMPTIONS — Swarm Alert Injection
|
|
|
|
Issues P0 CRITICAL directive to all OTOM swarm agents:
|
|
- NO ASSUMPTIONS
|
|
- NO GUESSES
|
|
- NO LOGICAL LEAPS
|
|
|
|
When the equation is complete, it must not be able to disprove itself.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
import sys
|
|
import json
|
|
import sqlite3
|
|
from datetime import datetime, timezone
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
from typing import Dict, Any
|
|
|
|
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).parent.parent.parent / "4-Infrastructure" / "infra"))
|
|
from lean_unified_shim import SwarmAPISystem
|
|
|
|
|
|
def issue_no_assumptions_directive() -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
|
"""
|
|
Issue strict formal rigor directive to entire swarm.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
api = SwarmAPISystem()
|
|
timestamp = datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()
|
|
|
|
directive = """
|
|
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
|
|
║ DIRECTIVE: NO ASSUMPTIONS — P0 CRITICAL ║
|
|
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
|
|
|
|
AUTHORITY: Principal Investigator
|
|
DATE: {timestamp}
|
|
SCOPE: All OTOM Swarm Agents
|
|
ENFORCEMENT: Triumvirate (Builder/Warden/Judge)
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
THE DIRECTIVE
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
NO ASSUMPTIONS.
|
|
NO GUESSES.
|
|
NO LOGICAL LEAPS.
|
|
|
|
When the equation is complete, it MUST NOT be able to disprove itself.
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
WHAT IS FORBIDDEN
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
1. ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT EXPLICIT AXIOM
|
|
FORBIDDEN: theorem foo : P := by sorry
|
|
REQUIRED: explicit axiom registration with justification
|
|
|
|
2. GUESSES IN PROOF STRATEGY
|
|
FORBIDDEN: simp -- "Hope this works"
|
|
REQUIRED: explicit tactic chain with axiom references
|
|
|
|
3. LOGICAL LEAPS IN DERIVATIONS
|
|
FORBIDDEN: "Follows from algebraic manipulation"
|
|
REQUIRED: Step-by-step derivation with axiom citations
|
|
|
|
4. IMPLICIT DEPENDENCIES
|
|
FORBIDDEN: Implicit assumption of normalization
|
|
REQUIRED: Explicit hypothesis (h : Σ w = 1)
|
|
|
|
5. APPROXIMATIONS WITHOUT ERROR BOUNDS
|
|
FORBIDDEN: ln(2) ≈ 0.693
|
|
REQUIRED: ln(2) = 0.693 ± 0.001 (explicit bound)
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
THE 6 EXPLICIT AXIOMS OF Φ_UNIVERSAL
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
All theorems derive from these 6 axioms ONLY:
|
|
|
|
AXIOM 1: harmonicDef
|
|
hᵢ = 1/(lnNᵢ)² [Definition of merit coefficient]
|
|
|
|
AXIOM 2: penaltyDef
|
|
pⱼ = 1/(lnNⱼ)² [Definition of penalty coefficient]
|
|
|
|
AXIOM 3: reciprocalWeightedIdentity
|
|
1/x = x·(1/x²) [Algebraic identity]
|
|
|
|
AXIOM 4: weightsNonNeg
|
|
wᵢ, vⱼ ≥ 0 [Domain constraint]
|
|
|
|
AXIOM 5: cardinalityConstraint
|
|
Nᵢ, Mⱼ ≥ 2 [Binary minimum, avoids ln(1)=0]
|
|
|
|
AXIOM 6: normalizationBounded
|
|
Σw=1, Σv=1 → Φ ≤ 1 [Normalization constraint]
|
|
|
|
THEOREM: If these 6 axioms are consistent, Φ is consistent.
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
SELF-CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENT
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
The Golden Rule:
|
|
When you finish the equation, it should not be able to disprove itself.
|
|
|
|
Verification Checklist:
|
|
□ Completeness: All hypotheses explicit
|
|
□ Consistency: Axioms do not contradict
|
|
□ Non-circularity: Proof DAG is acyclic
|
|
□ Conservativity: New axioms don't falsify old theorems
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
SWARM PROTOCOL — WHEN YOU ENCOUNTER A GAP
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
DO NOT:
|
|
✗ Guess a proof strategy
|
|
✗ Insert 'sorry' with TODO
|
|
✗ Assume it "probably holds"
|
|
✗ Make a logical leap
|
|
|
|
DO:
|
|
1. STOP — Do not proceed
|
|
2. IDENTIFY — What is missing?
|
|
3. EXPLICITIZE — Convert to explicit axiom
|
|
4. JUSTIFY — Why axiom vs theorem?
|
|
5. SCOPE — What depends on this?
|
|
6. DOCUMENT — Add to axiom registry
|
|
7. ESCALATE — Notify Warden if unsure
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
WARDEN VERIFICATION PROTOCOL
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
For each proof:
|
|
1. Trace every tactic to axiom/theorem
|
|
2. Verify no implicit assumptions
|
|
3. Check completeness (no 'sorry')
|
|
4. Validate no circular dependencies
|
|
5. Confirm no logical leaps
|
|
6. Sign off with hardware attestation
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
JUDGE ADJUDICATION CRITERIA
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
APPROVED only if:
|
|
✓ Zero 'sorry' in code
|
|
✓ All axioms explicitly registered
|
|
✓ All theorems derive from axioms
|
|
✓ Self-consistency verified
|
|
✓ No logical leaps
|
|
✓ No guesses
|
|
✓ No implicit assumptions
|
|
|
|
REJECTED if:
|
|
✗ Any 'sorry' remains
|
|
✗ Implicit assumptions found
|
|
✗ Self-inconsistency detected
|
|
✗ Logical leaps identified
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
ENFORCEMENT
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
Triumvirate:
|
|
Builder: Must use explicit axioms only
|
|
Warden: Must verify all steps traceable
|
|
Judge: Must reject code with gaps
|
|
|
|
Penalties:
|
|
Implicit assumption → Revert commit
|
|
'sorry' in code → Block deployment
|
|
Logical leap → Return to Builder
|
|
Self-inconsistency → Escalate to PI
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
DOCUMENTATION
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
Full directive: 6-Documentation/docs/papers/DIRECTIVE_NO_ASSUMPTIONS.md
|
|
Axiom registry: 0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/Semantics/UniversalField.lean §4
|
|
Implementation: 0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/Semantics/UniversalField.lean §5-6
|
|
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
THE SWARM OPERATES ON EXPLICIT AXIOMS ONLY.
|
|
|
|
NO ASSUMPTIONS.
|
|
NO GUESSES.
|
|
NO LOGICAL LEAPS.
|
|
|
|
When the equation is complete, it must not be able to disprove itself.
|
|
""".format(timestamp=timestamp)
|
|
|
|
# Inject into priority_alerts
|
|
if api.conn:
|
|
cursor = api.conn.cursor()
|
|
|
|
cursor.execute("""
|
|
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO priority_alerts
|
|
(entity_id, subject, name, statement, proof_status, formal_status,
|
|
priority, requires_immediate_action, created_at)
|
|
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
|
|
""", (
|
|
f'DIRECTIVE_NO_ASSUMPTIONS_{timestamp.replace(":", "_")}',
|
|
'directive',
|
|
'[P0] DIRECTIVE: NO ASSUMPTIONS — Strict Formal Rigor',
|
|
directive,
|
|
'directive',
|
|
'enforced',
|
|
'P0',
|
|
True,
|
|
timestamp
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
api.conn.commit()
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
'success': True,
|
|
'directive': 'NO_ASSUMPTIONS',
|
|
'timestamp': timestamp,
|
|
'scope': 'All OTOM Swarm Agents',
|
|
'enforcement': 'Triumvirate',
|
|
'axioms_defined': 6,
|
|
'status': 'ACTIVE'
|
|
}
|
|
else:
|
|
return {
|
|
'success': False,
|
|
'error': 'Database not connected',
|
|
'directive_printed': True
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def main():
|
|
print("="*70)
|
|
print("DIRECTIVE: NO ASSUMPTIONS")
|
|
print("="*70)
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
result = issue_no_assumptions_directive()
|
|
|
|
if result['success']:
|
|
print(f"[✓] DIRECTIVE ISSUED: {result['directive']}")
|
|
print()
|
|
print(f"Scope: {result['scope']}")
|
|
print(f"Enforcement: {result['enforcement']}")
|
|
print(f"Axioms: {result['axioms_defined']} explicit axioms")
|
|
print(f"Status: {result['status']}")
|
|
print()
|
|
print("="*70)
|
|
print("STRICT FORMAL RIGOR ENFORCED")
|
|
print()
|
|
print("The Golden Rule:")
|
|
print(" When the equation is complete, it must not")
|
|
print(" be able to disprove itself.")
|
|
print()
|
|
print("All swarm agents must:")
|
|
print(" □ Use explicit axioms only")
|
|
print(" □ No 'sorry' in code")
|
|
print(" □ No logical leaps")
|
|
print(" □ No implicit assumptions")
|
|
print()
|
|
print("Documentation:")
|
|
print(" 6-Documentation/docs/papers/DIRECTIVE_NO_ASSUMPTIONS.md")
|
|
print("="*70)
|
|
else:
|
|
print(f"[✗] Failed: {result.get('error', 'Unknown')}")
|
|
|
|
return result
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
main()
|