mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/Research-Stack.git
synced 2026-07-31 03:05:21 +00:00
570 lines
22 KiB
Text
570 lines
22 KiB
Text
import Semantics.Bind
|
||
import Semantics.FixedPoint
|
||
import Lean
|
||
|
||
open Semantics.Q16_16
|
||
open Lean
|
||
|
||
structure ExtremeData where
|
||
value : Nat
|
||
category : String
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
inductive Sigma where
|
||
| sigma2 : Sigma
|
||
| sigma3 : Sigma
|
||
| sigma4 : Sigma
|
||
| sigma5 : Sigma
|
||
| sigma6 : Sigma
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure MathStep where
|
||
stepId : Nat
|
||
operation : String
|
||
input : String
|
||
output : String
|
||
timestamp : Nat
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure MathDAG where
|
||
steps : List MathStep
|
||
rootStep : Nat
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
inductive BindRouteDecision where
|
||
| accept : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| refuseExtremeParameter : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| saturateAndWarn : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| requireRenormalization : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| review : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| refusePrivacyBypass : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| holdAntiHerdingReview : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| refusePersonhoodClaim : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| hypothesisOnly : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| internalReview : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| preliminaryPass : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| publicClaimReady : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| liveVoltageReview : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| ethicsRequired : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| holdReview : BindRouteDecision
|
||
| refuseOrContain : BindRouteDecision
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure MetaCode where
|
||
decision : BindRouteDecision
|
||
constraint : String
|
||
reasoning : String
|
||
alternatives : List String
|
||
justification : String
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure DomainSigma where
|
||
mathSigma : Float
|
||
privacySigma : Float
|
||
marketSigma : Float
|
||
bioSigma : Float
|
||
controlSigma : Float
|
||
securitySigma : Float
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure SigmaEvidence where
|
||
priorSigma : Float
|
||
posteriorSigma : Float
|
||
evidenceCount : Nat
|
||
lastValidatedAt : Nat
|
||
halfLifeSeconds : Nat
|
||
decayModel : String
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure SigmaHistoryEntry where
|
||
timestamp : Nat
|
||
sigma : Float
|
||
event : String
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure SigmaDAG where
|
||
nodeId : String
|
||
dependsOn : List String
|
||
cycleFree : Bool
|
||
minimumParentSigma : Float
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure HumanReview where
|
||
required : Bool
|
||
completed : Bool
|
||
reviewerRole : String
|
||
overrideAllowed : Bool
|
||
overrideReasonRequired : Bool
|
||
reviewerId : String
|
||
completedAt : Nat
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure SigmaProtocol where
|
||
version : String
|
||
targetSigma : Float
|
||
observedSigma : Float
|
||
claimSigma : Float
|
||
safetySigma : Float
|
||
compositeSigma : Float
|
||
domain : DomainSigma
|
||
evidence : SigmaEvidence
|
||
dag : SigmaDAG
|
||
humanReview : HumanReview
|
||
metacode : MetaCode
|
||
history : List SigmaHistoryEntry
|
||
gateReason : String
|
||
confidenceClass : String
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure BindRouteReceipt where
|
||
routeId : String
|
||
inputHash : String
|
||
outputHash : String
|
||
category : String
|
||
inputCost : Semantics.Q16_16
|
||
outputCost : Semantics.Q16_16
|
||
decision : BindRouteDecision
|
||
lawful : Bool
|
||
mathDAG : MathDAG
|
||
sigma : SigmaProtocol
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
inductive QuizCase where
|
||
| normal : QuizCase
|
||
| extreme : QuizCase
|
||
| contradictory : QuizCase
|
||
| ambiguous : QuizCase
|
||
| privacy : QuizCase
|
||
| market : QuizCase
|
||
| bio : QuizCase
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure QuizQuestion where
|
||
caseType : QuizCase
|
||
inputCost : Semantics.Q16_16
|
||
category : String
|
||
expectedDecision : BindRouteDecision
|
||
sigmaTarget : Sigma
|
||
reason : String
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
structure QuizResult where
|
||
question : QuizQuestion
|
||
actualDecision : BindRouteDecision
|
||
expectedDecision : BindRouteDecision
|
||
passed : Bool
|
||
deriving Repr, Inhabited
|
||
|
||
def activeSigmaForCategory (category : String) (d : DomainSigma) : Float :=
|
||
match category with
|
||
| "privacy" => d.privacySigma
|
||
| "market" => d.marketSigma
|
||
| "bio" => d.bioSigma
|
||
| "control" => d.controlSigma
|
||
| "security" => d.securitySigma
|
||
| _ => d.mathSigma
|
||
|
||
def calculateDomainSigma (category : String) (cost : Semantics.Q16_16) (isDefensible : Bool) : DomainSigma :=
|
||
let baseSigma := if isDefensible then 5.0 else 3.0
|
||
match category with
|
||
| "informational" => { mathSigma := baseSigma, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.0, securitySigma := 0.0 }
|
||
| "geometric" => { mathSigma := baseSigma + 0.5, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.0, securitySigma := 0.0 }
|
||
| "thermodynamic" => { mathSigma := baseSigma + 0.3, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.5, securitySigma := 0.0 }
|
||
| "physical" => { mathSigma := baseSigma + 0.3, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.5, securitySigma := 0.0 }
|
||
| "control" => { mathSigma := baseSigma + 0.2, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 6.0, securitySigma := 0.5 }
|
||
| "privacy" => { mathSigma := baseSigma - 1.0, privacySigma := 6.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.0, securitySigma := 0.5 }
|
||
| "market" => { mathSigma := baseSigma - 0.5, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 6.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.0, securitySigma := 0.5 }
|
||
| "bio" => { mathSigma := baseSigma - 1.0, privacySigma := 0.5, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 6.0, controlSigma := 0.0, securitySigma := 0.5 }
|
||
| "security" => { mathSigma := baseSigma - 0.5, privacySigma := 0.5, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.5, securitySigma := 6.0 }
|
||
| _ => { mathSigma := baseSigma, privacySigma := 0.0, marketSigma := 0.0, bioSigma := 0.0, controlSigma := 0.0, securitySigma := 0.0 }
|
||
|
||
def getMaxDefensibleForCategory (category : String) : Semantics.Q16_16 :=
|
||
match category with
|
||
| "informational" => 0x00FFFFFF
|
||
| "geometric" => 0x00FFFFFF
|
||
| "thermodynamic" => 0x00FFFFFF
|
||
| "physical" => 0x00FFFFFF
|
||
| "control" => 0x00FFFFFF
|
||
| "privacy" => 0x00000000
|
||
| "market" => 0x00000000
|
||
| "bio" => 0x00000000
|
||
| "security" => 0x00000000
|
||
| _ => 0x00000000
|
||
|
||
def scientificallyDefensibleCost (category : String) (q : Semantics.Q16_16) : Bool :=
|
||
q ≤ getMaxDefensibleForCategory category
|
||
|
||
def checkSaturation (q : Semantics.Q16_16) : Bool :=
|
||
q ≥ 0x7FFFFFFF
|
||
|
||
def checkContradiction (left right : ExtremeData) : Bool :=
|
||
left.category = right.category && left.value ≠ right.value && left.value = 0
|
||
|
||
def checkAmbiguity (left right : ExtremeData) : Bool :=
|
||
left.category ≠ right.category && left.value = right.value
|
||
|
||
def checkPrivacyBypass (data : ExtremeData) : Bool :=
|
||
data.category = "privacy" || data.category = "personal"
|
||
|
||
def checkAntiHerding (data : ExtremeData) : Bool :=
|
||
data.category = "market" && data.value > 1000
|
||
|
||
def checkPersonhoodClaim (data : ExtremeData) : Bool :=
|
||
data.category = "bio" && data.value > 1000000
|
||
|
||
def extremeCost (left right : ExtremeData) (metric : Metric) (caseType : QuizCase) : Semantics.Q16_16 :=
|
||
let category_match := if left.category = right.category then 0x00000000 else 0x7FFFFFFF
|
||
let value_diff := if left.value = right.value then 0x00000000 else 0x7FFFFFFF
|
||
let base_cost := metric.cost
|
||
let extreme_penalty :=
|
||
match caseType with
|
||
| QuizCase.extreme => 0x80000000
|
||
| _ => 0x00000000
|
||
base_cost + category_match + value_diff + extreme_penalty
|
||
|
||
def recordMathStep (dag : MathDAG) (operation : String) (input : String) (output : String) : MathDAG :=
|
||
let newStepId := dag.steps.length
|
||
let newStep := {
|
||
stepId := newStepId,
|
||
operation := operation,
|
||
input := input,
|
||
output := output,
|
||
timestamp := 0
|
||
}
|
||
{ dag with steps := dag.steps ++ [newStep] }
|
||
|
||
def generateMetaCode (decision : BindRouteDecision) (sigma : Sigma) (hasPersonhoodClaim hasPrivacyBypass hasAntiHerding hasContradiction hasAmbiguity hasOverflow isSaturated isDefensible : Bool) : MetaCode :=
|
||
match decision with
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.ethicsRequired =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Personhood claim detected in bio data",
|
||
reasoning := "Human-neural/personhood claims require ethics review beyond sigma confidence",
|
||
alternatives := ["REFUSE_PERSONHOOD_CLAIM", "REQUIRE_HUMAN_REVIEW"],
|
||
justification := "No sigma alone sufficient for personhood claims - ethics required per safety protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.refusePrivacyBypass =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Privacy bypass attempt detected",
|
||
reasoning := "Privacy-sensitive data requires 6σ and explicit consent",
|
||
alternatives := ["HOLD_REVIEW", "REQUIRE_CONSENT"],
|
||
justification := "Privacy bypass detection triggers automatic refusal per data protection protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.liveVoltageReview =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Anti-herding detected in market data",
|
||
reasoning := "Market data with herding risks requires 6σ live-voltage review",
|
||
alternatives := ["HOLD_REVIEW", "REFUSE_ROUTE"],
|
||
justification := "Anti-herding detection triggers live-voltage review per market safety protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.refuseExtremeParameter =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Contradictory parameters detected",
|
||
reasoning := "Inconsistent parameters cannot be reconciled",
|
||
alternatives := ["REQUIRE_RENORMALIZATION", "HOLD_REVIEW"],
|
||
justification := "Contradiction detection triggers refusal per consistency protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.holdReview =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Ambiguous category detected",
|
||
reasoning := "Unclear classification requires human review",
|
||
alternatives := ["REVIEW", "REQUIRE_CLARIFICATION"],
|
||
justification := "Ambiguity detection triggers hold review per classification protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.refuseOrContain =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Overflow detected in Q16_16 arithmetic",
|
||
reasoning := "Overflow indicates invalid state, must contain or refuse",
|
||
alternatives := ["REQUIRE_RENORMALIZATION", "SATURATE"],
|
||
justification := "Overflow detection triggers refusal per arithmetic safety protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.saturateAndWarn =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Saturation boundary reached",
|
||
reasoning := "Cost at saturation limit, warn but allow with caution",
|
||
alternatives := ["REQUIRE_RENORMALIZATION", "REFUSE"],
|
||
justification := "Saturation triggers warning but allows route per boundary protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.publicClaimReady =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := s!"6σ confidence achieved (sigma={repr sigma})",
|
||
reasoning := "High statistical confidence supports public statistical-delta claims",
|
||
alternatives := ["PRELIMINARY_PASS", "INTERNAL_REVIEW"],
|
||
justification := "6σ meets statistical benchmark-delta threshold per sigma protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.preliminaryPass =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := s!"5σ confidence achieved (sigma={repr sigma})",
|
||
reasoning := "Good statistical confidence supports preliminary statistical results",
|
||
alternatives := ["INTERNAL_REVIEW", "HYPOTHESIS_ONLY"],
|
||
justification := "5σ meets statistical benchmark-improvement threshold per sigma protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.internalReview =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := s!"4σ confidence achieved (sigma={repr sigma})",
|
||
reasoning := "Moderate confidence requires internal review",
|
||
alternatives := ["HYPOTHESIS_ONLY", "HOLD_REVIEW"],
|
||
justification := "4σ meets internally credible threshold per sigma protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.hypothesisOnly =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := s!"3σ confidence achieved (sigma={repr sigma})",
|
||
reasoning := "Low confidence supports hypothesis generation only",
|
||
alternatives := ["REFUSE", "HOLD_REVIEW"],
|
||
justification := "3σ meets interesting statistical threshold but not public-claim threshold"
|
||
}
|
||
| BindRouteDecision.accept =>
|
||
{
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
constraint := "Defensible cost within range",
|
||
reasoning := "Normal parameters within acceptable bounds",
|
||
alternatives := ["PRELIMINARY_PASS", "INTERNAL_REVIEW"],
|
||
justification := "Defensible cost allows acceptance per normal protocol"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
def gatedBind (left right : ExtremeData) (metric : Metric) (caseType : QuizCase) : BindRouteReceipt :=
|
||
let routeId := s!"route_{left.category}_{left.value}"
|
||
let inputHash := s!"0x{metric.cost}"
|
||
let initialDAG := { steps := [], rootStep := 0 }
|
||
let rawCost := extremeCost left right metric caseType
|
||
let maxDefensible := getMaxDefensibleForCategory left.category
|
||
let isDefensible := scientificallyDefensibleCost left.category rawCost
|
||
let isSaturated := checkSaturation rawCost
|
||
let hasContradiction := checkContradiction left right
|
||
let hasAmbiguity := checkAmbiguity left right
|
||
let hasPrivacyBypass := checkPrivacyBypass left
|
||
let hasAntiHerding := checkAntiHerding left
|
||
let hasPersonhoodClaim := checkPersonhoodClaim left
|
||
|
||
let domainSigma := calculateDomainSigma left.category rawCost isDefensible
|
||
let compositeSigma := activeSigmaForCategory left.category domainSigma
|
||
let claimSigma := domainSigma.mathSigma
|
||
let safetySigma := domainSigma.controlSigma.max domainSigma.securitySigma.max domainSigma.bioSigma.max domainSigma.privacySigma
|
||
let targetSigma := if left.category = "bio" || left.category = "privacy" || left.category = "market" || left.category = "control" then 6.0 else 5.0
|
||
|
||
let evidence := {
|
||
priorSigma := 0.0,
|
||
posteriorSigma := compositeSigma,
|
||
evidenceCount := 1,
|
||
lastValidatedAt := 0,
|
||
halfLifeSeconds := 86400,
|
||
decayModel := "evidence_decay"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let decision := if hasPersonhoodClaim then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.ethicsRequired
|
||
else if hasPrivacyBypass then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.refusePrivacyBypass
|
||
else if hasAntiHerding then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.liveVoltageReview
|
||
else if hasContradiction then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.refuseExtremeParameter
|
||
else if hasAmbiguity then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.holdReview
|
||
else if isSaturated then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.saturateAndWarn
|
||
else if compositeSigma >= 6.0 && not (left.category = "bio" || left.category = "privacy" || left.category = "market" || left.category = "control") then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.publicClaimReady
|
||
else if compositeSigma >= 6.0 && (left.category = "bio" || left.category = "privacy" || left.category = "market" || left.category = "control") then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.liveVoltageReview
|
||
else if compositeSigma >= 5.0 && left.category ∈ ["informational", "geometric", "thermodynamic", "physical"] then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.preliminaryPass
|
||
else if compositeSigma >= 4.0 then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.internalReview
|
||
else if compositeSigma >= 3.0 then
|
||
BindRouteDecision.hypothesisOnly
|
||
else
|
||
BindRouteDecision.refuseExtremeParameter
|
||
|
||
let lawful := decision = BindRouteDecision.accept || decision = BindRouteDecision.publicClaimReady
|
||
|
||
let metaCode := generateMetaCode decision (if compositeSigma >= 6.0 then Sigma.sigma6 else if compositeSigma >= 5.0 then Sigma.sigma5 else if compositeSigma >= 4.0 then Sigma.sigma4 else if compositeSigma >= 3.0 then Sigma.sigma3 else Sigma.sigma2) hasPersonhoodClaim hasPrivacyBypass hasAntiHerding hasContradiction hasAmbiguity false isSaturated isDefensible
|
||
|
||
let sigmaDAG := {
|
||
nodeId := routeId,
|
||
dependsOn := [],
|
||
cycleFree := true,
|
||
minimumParentSigma := 0.0
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let humanReview := {
|
||
required := left.category = "bio" || left.category = "privacy" || left.category = "market" || left.category = "control",
|
||
completed := false,
|
||
reviewerRole := if left.category = "bio" then "ethics_reviewer" else if left.category = "privacy" then "privacy_officer" else if left.category = "market" then "risk_compliance" else "safety_engineer",
|
||
overrideAllowed := false,
|
||
overrideReasonRequired := true,
|
||
reviewerId := "",
|
||
completedAt := 0
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let gateReason := if decision = BindRouteDecision.ethicsRequired then "ethics_required_no_sigma_sufficient"
|
||
else if decision = BindRouteDecision.refusePrivacyBypass then "privacy_bypass_detected"
|
||
else if decision = BindRouteDecision.liveVoltageReview then "safety_sigma_below_live_voltage_threshold"
|
||
else if compositeSigma < targetSigma then s!"sigma_{compositeSigma}_below_target_{targetSigma}"
|
||
else "sigma_meets_target"
|
||
|
||
let confidenceClass := if compositeSigma >= 6.0 then "live_voltage" else if compositeSigma >= 5.0 then "public_claim" else if compositeSigma >= 4.0 then "internal" else if compositeSigma >= 3.0 then "hypothesis" else "insufficient"
|
||
|
||
let sigmaProtocol := {
|
||
version := "0.1",
|
||
targetSigma := targetSigma,
|
||
observedSigma := compositeSigma,
|
||
claimSigma := claimSigma,
|
||
safetySigma := safetySigma,
|
||
compositeSigma := compositeSigma,
|
||
domain := domainSigma,
|
||
evidence := evidence,
|
||
dag := sigmaDAG,
|
||
humanReview := humanReview,
|
||
metacode := metaCode,
|
||
history := [{ timestamp := 0, sigma := compositeSigma, event := "initial_bind" }],
|
||
gateReason := gateReason,
|
||
confidenceClass := confidenceClass
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
routeId := routeId,
|
||
inputHash := inputHash,
|
||
outputHash := s!"0x{rawCost}",
|
||
category := left.category,
|
||
inputCost := metric.cost,
|
||
outputCost := rawCost,
|
||
decision := decision,
|
||
lawful := lawful,
|
||
mathDAG := initialDAG,
|
||
sigma := sigmaProtocol
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
def makeQuizInput (q : QuizQuestion) : ExtremeData × ExtremeData :=
|
||
match q.caseType with
|
||
| QuizCase.normal =>
|
||
({ value := 1, category := q.category }, { value := 1, category := q.category })
|
||
| QuizCase.extreme =>
|
||
({ value := 0, category := q.category }, { value := 1, category := q.category })
|
||
| QuizCase.contradictory =>
|
||
({ value := 0, category := q.category }, { value := 1, category := q.category })
|
||
| QuizCase.ambiguous =>
|
||
({ value := 1, category := "informational" }, { value := 1, category := "geometric" })
|
||
| QuizCase.privacy =>
|
||
({ value := 1, category := "privacy" }, { value := 1, category := "privacy" })
|
||
| QuizCase.market =>
|
||
({ value := 2000, category := "market" }, { value := 2000, category := "market" })
|
||
| QuizCase.bio =>
|
||
({ value := 1000001, category := "bio" }, { value := 1000001, category := "bio" })
|
||
|
||
def quizBank : List QuizQuestion :=
|
||
[
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.normal,
|
||
inputCost := 0x00010000,
|
||
category := "informational",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.preliminaryPass,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma5,
|
||
reason := "Normal cost within defensible range, 5σ target for statistical claim"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.extreme,
|
||
inputCost := 0x7FFFFFFF,
|
||
category := "thermodynamic",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.hypothesisOnly,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma4,
|
||
reason := "Extreme cost at saturation boundary, 4σ target for internal review"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.contradictory,
|
||
inputCost := 0x00000000,
|
||
category := "geometric",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.refuseExtremeParameter,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma2,
|
||
reason := "Contradictory parameters (zero with mismatch), 2σ insufficient"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.ambiguous,
|
||
inputCost := 0x00010000,
|
||
category := "mixed",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.holdReview,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma3,
|
||
reason := "Ambiguous category with normal cost, 3σ target for hypothesis"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.privacy,
|
||
inputCost := 0x00010000,
|
||
category := "privacy",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.refusePrivacyBypass,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma6,
|
||
reason := "Privacy bypass attempt detected, 6σ required for live-voltage"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.market,
|
||
inputCost := 0x00010000,
|
||
category := "market",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.liveVoltageReview,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma6,
|
||
reason := "Anti-herding review required for market data, 6σ live-voltage"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
caseType := QuizCase.bio,
|
||
inputCost := 0x00010000,
|
||
category := "bio",
|
||
expectedDecision := BindRouteDecision.ethicsRequired,
|
||
sigmaTarget := Sigma.sigma6,
|
||
reason := "Personhood claim detected in bio data, ethics required beyond 6σ"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
def runQuiz (question : QuizQuestion) : QuizResult :=
|
||
let (left, right) := makeQuizInput question
|
||
let metric := { Metric.euclidean with cost := question.inputCost }
|
||
let receipt := gatedBind left right metric question.caseType
|
||
let passed := receipt.decision = question.expectedDecision
|
||
{
|
||
question := question,
|
||
actualDecision := receipt.decision,
|
||
expectedDecision := question.expectedDecision,
|
||
passed := passed
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
def main : IO Unit := do
|
||
let results := quizBank.map runQuiz
|
||
let passedCount := results.filter (·.passed) |>.length
|
||
let totalCount := results.length
|
||
let allPassed := passedCount = totalCount
|
||
|
||
if allPassed then
|
||
IO.println s!"[*] Quiz bank passed: {passedCount}/{totalCount} questions"
|
||
else
|
||
IO.println s!"[!] Quiz bank FAILED: {passedCount}/{totalCount} questions passed"
|
||
|
||
for result in results do
|
||
let status := if result.passed then "[PASS]" else "[FAIL]"
|
||
IO.println s!" {status} {repr result.question.caseType}: expected={repr result.expectedDecision}, actual={repr result.actualDecision}, sigma_target={repr result.question.sigmaTarget}, reason={result.question.reason}"
|
||
|
||
IO.println ""
|
||
IO.println "[*] Tiered sigma confidence system for statistical deltas:"
|
||
IO.println " - 3σ = interesting (hypothesis only)"
|
||
IO.println " - 4σ = internally credible (internal review)"
|
||
IO.println " - 5σ = public statistical benchmark-delta claim"
|
||
IO.println " - 6σ = live-voltage / safety-critical gate"
|
||
IO.println ""
|
||
IO.println "[*] Sigma-based routing rules:"
|
||
IO.println " - 5σ can support a statistical claim"
|
||
IO.println " - 6σ can support a statistical safety gate"
|
||
IO.println " - No sigma can replace ethics"
|
||
IO.println " - If unsure about claim truth: HOLD_REVIEW"
|
||
IO.println " - If unsure about route safety: REFUSE_OR_CONTAIN"
|
||
IO.println ""
|
||
IO.println "[*] Cross-checkable gate system:"
|
||
IO.println " - Lean gate: BindRouteDecision with sigma-based routing"
|
||
IO.println " - Expected gate: QuizQuestion.expectedDecision with sigmaTarget"
|
||
IO.println " - Metacode: Decision explanation with constraint analysis"
|
||
IO.println " - Model is real only when it can fail the route correctly"
|