mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/SilverSight.git
synced 2026-07-31 01:25:21 +00:00
feat(avm): implement static type-checking and math primitives in AVMIsa
Added Q16_16 multiplication, division, and comparison operators to Prim and Step semantics. Implemented static type checking (checkInstr, checkProgram) in TypeCheck.lean and proved the step_preservation safety theorem in TypeSafety.lean. Verified with new arithmetic execution canaries in Run.lean. Build: 3307 jobs, 0 errors (lake build)
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a45da0462
commit
cb50581eef
7 changed files with 555 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ Target: `formal/SilverSight/HachimojiN8.lean` — provable by `native_decide` on
|
|||
| PIST/YangBaxter.lean | Complete (Layer 2d) | 0 |
|
||||
| PIST/UnifiedCovariant.lean | Complete (L1 + L2c: 0 sorries; L3: 7 sorries) | 7† |
|
||||
| CoreFormalism/ChentsovFinite.lean | Complete (3 axioms) | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/Types.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/Value.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/Instr.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/State.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/Step.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/TypeCheck.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/TypeSafety.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
| AVMIsa/Run.lean | Complete | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
† Layer 3 sorries are geometric conjectures (Kähler on ℂℙ⁷, Cartan connection,
|
||||
holonomy SO⁰(1,6)) deferred pending Mathlib infrastructure. Layer 1 (4
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ inductive Prim : Type where
|
|||
| subSatQ0
|
||||
| addSatQ16
|
||||
| subSatQ16
|
||||
| mulSatQ16
|
||||
| divSatQ16
|
||||
| ltQ16
|
||||
| eqQ16
|
||||
| and
|
||||
| or
|
||||
| not
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -35,10 +35,48 @@ def canaryNot : List Instr :=
|
|||
Instr.halt
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Canary: Q16.16 multiplication.
|
||||
Push 1.0 (65536) → Push 0.5 (32768) → mulSatQ16 → halt.
|
||||
Expect 0.5 (32768) on top of stack. -/
|
||||
def canaryMul : List Instr :=
|
||||
[
|
||||
Instr.push ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.ofRawInt 65536)⟩,
|
||||
Instr.push ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.ofRawInt 32768)⟩,
|
||||
Instr.prim Prim.mulSatQ16,
|
||||
Instr.halt
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Canary: Q16.16 division.
|
||||
Push 2.0 (131072) → Push 0.5 (32768) → divSatQ16 → halt.
|
||||
Divides second by first: 2.0 / 0.5 = 4.0 (262144).
|
||||
Expect 4.0 (262144) on top of stack. -/
|
||||
def canaryDiv : List Instr :=
|
||||
[
|
||||
Instr.push ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.ofRawInt 131072)⟩,
|
||||
Instr.push ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.ofRawInt 32768)⟩,
|
||||
Instr.prim Prim.divSatQ16,
|
||||
Instr.halt
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Canary: Q16.16 comparison.
|
||||
Push 1.0 (65536) → Push 0.5 (32768) → ltQ16 → halt.
|
||||
Compares second < first: 1.0 < 0.5 = false.
|
||||
Expect false on top of stack. -/
|
||||
def canaryLt : List Instr :=
|
||||
[
|
||||
Instr.push ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.ofRawInt 65536)⟩,
|
||||
Instr.push ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.ofRawInt 32768)⟩,
|
||||
Instr.prim Prim.ltQ16,
|
||||
Instr.halt
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Canary initial state. -/
|
||||
def canaryState : State :=
|
||||
{ pc := 0, stack := [], locals := [], halted := false }
|
||||
|
||||
#eval run 8 canaryNot canaryState
|
||||
#eval run 8 canaryMul canaryState
|
||||
#eval run 8 canaryDiv canaryState
|
||||
#eval run 8 canaryLt canaryState
|
||||
|
||||
end SilverSight.AVMIsa
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -112,6 +112,52 @@ def evalPrim (p : Prim) (s : State) : Outcome State :=
|
|||
| ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 x⟩, ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 y⟩ =>
|
||||
Outcome.ok (push1 s2 ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.sub y x)⟩)
|
||||
| _, _ => Outcome.err StepError.typeMismatch
|
||||
| Prim.mulSatQ16 =>
|
||||
match pop1 s with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v1, s1) =>
|
||||
match pop1 s1 with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v2, s2) =>
|
||||
match v1, v2 with
|
||||
| ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 x⟩, ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 y⟩ =>
|
||||
Outcome.ok (push1 s2 ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.mul y x)⟩)
|
||||
| _, _ => Outcome.err StepError.typeMismatch
|
||||
| Prim.divSatQ16 =>
|
||||
match pop1 s with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v1, s1) =>
|
||||
match pop1 s1 with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v2, s2) =>
|
||||
match v1, v2 with
|
||||
| ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 x⟩, ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 y⟩ =>
|
||||
Outcome.ok (push1 s2 ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 (SilverSight.Q16_16.div y x)⟩)
|
||||
| _, _ => Outcome.err StepError.typeMismatch
|
||||
| Prim.ltQ16 =>
|
||||
match pop1 s with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v1, s1) =>
|
||||
match pop1 s1 with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v2, s2) =>
|
||||
match v1, v2 with
|
||||
| ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 x⟩, ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 y⟩ =>
|
||||
let res := y.toInt < x.toInt
|
||||
Outcome.ok (push1 s2 ⟨AvmTy.bool, AvmVal.b res⟩)
|
||||
| _, _ => Outcome.err StepError.typeMismatch
|
||||
| Prim.eqQ16 =>
|
||||
match pop1 s with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v1, s1) =>
|
||||
match pop1 s1 with
|
||||
| Outcome.err e => Outcome.err e
|
||||
| Outcome.ok (v2, s2) =>
|
||||
match v1, v2 with
|
||||
| ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 x⟩, ⟨AvmTy.q16_16, AvmVal.q16 y⟩ =>
|
||||
let res := y.val == x.val
|
||||
Outcome.ok (push1 s2 ⟨AvmTy.bool, AvmVal.b res⟩)
|
||||
| _, _ => Outcome.err StepError.typeMismatch
|
||||
|
||||
/-- One-step execution.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
96
formal/SilverSight/AVMIsa/TypeCheck.lean
Normal file
96
formal/SilverSight/AVMIsa/TypeCheck.lean
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
|||
-- AVM ISA v1 (Lean-only): Static Type Checker
|
||||
2:
|
||||
3: import SilverSight.AVMIsa.Instr
|
||||
4:
|
||||
5: namespace SilverSight.AVMIsa
|
||||
6:
|
||||
7: /-- Helper to check Primitive type correctness. -/
|
||||
8: def checkPrim (p : Prim) : List AvmTy → Option (List AvmTy)
|
||||
9: | .not => fun stack =>
|
||||
10: match stack with
|
||||
11: | .bool :: xs => some (.bool :: xs)
|
||||
12: | _ => none
|
||||
13: | .and | .or => fun stack =>
|
||||
14: match stack with
|
||||
15: | .bool :: .bool :: xs => some (.bool :: xs)
|
||||
16: | _ => none
|
||||
17: | .addSatQ0 | .subSatQ0 => fun stack =>
|
||||
18: match stack with
|
||||
19: | .q0_16 :: .q0_16 :: xs => some (.q0_16 :: xs)
|
||||
20: | _ => none
|
||||
21: | .addSatQ16 | .subSatQ16 | .mulSatQ16 | .divSatQ16 => fun stack =>
|
||||
22: match stack with
|
||||
23: | .q16_16 :: .q16_16 :: xs => some (.q16_16 :: xs)
|
||||
24: | _ => none
|
||||
25: | .ltQ16 | .eqQ16 => fun stack =>
|
||||
26: match stack with
|
||||
27: | .q16_16 :: .q16_16 :: xs => some (.bool :: xs)
|
||||
28: | _ => none
|
||||
29:
|
||||
30: /-- One-step static type checking of a single instruction.
|
||||
31: Returns `some (new_stack, new_locals)` if type-correct, else `none`. -/
|
||||
32: def checkInstr (instr : Instr) (stack : List AvmTy) (locals : List (Option AvmTy)) :
|
||||
33: Option (List AvmTy × List (Option AvmTy)) :=
|
||||
34: match instr with
|
||||
35: | .push v => some (v.ty :: stack, locals)
|
||||
36: | .pop =>
|
||||
37: match stack with
|
||||
38: | _ :: xs => some (xs, locals)
|
||||
39: | [] => none
|
||||
40: | .dup =>
|
||||
41: match stack with
|
||||
42: | x :: xs => some (x :: x :: xs, locals)
|
||||
43: | [] => none
|
||||
44: | .swap =>
|
||||
45: match stack with
|
||||
46: | x :: y :: xs => some (y :: x :: xs, locals)
|
||||
47: | _ => none
|
||||
48: | .load i =>
|
||||
49: match locals[i]? with
|
||||
50: | some (some ty) => some (ty :: stack, locals)
|
||||
51: | _ => none
|
||||
52: | .store i =>
|
||||
53: if i < locals.length then
|
||||
54: match stack with
|
||||
55: | x :: xs => some (xs, locals.set i (some x))
|
||||
56: | [] => none
|
||||
57: else none
|
||||
58: | .jump _ => some (stack, locals)
|
||||
59: | .jumpIf _ =>
|
||||
60: match stack with
|
||||
61: | .bool :: xs => some (xs, locals)
|
||||
62: | _ => none
|
||||
63: | .prim p =>
|
||||
64: match checkPrim p stack with
|
||||
65: | some stack' => some (stack', locals)
|
||||
66: | none => none
|
||||
67: | .halt => some (stack, locals)
|
||||
68:
|
||||
69: /-- Check a whole instruction program sequentially. -/
|
||||
70: def checkProgram (prog : List Instr) (initStack : List AvmTy) (initLocals : List (Option AvmTy)) : Bool :=
|
||||
71: let rec loop (pc : Nat) (stack : List AvmTy) (locals : List (Option AvmTy)) (fuel : Nat) : Bool :=
|
||||
72: match fuel with
|
||||
73: | 0 => false
|
||||
74: | f + 1 =>
|
||||
75: match prog[pc]? with
|
||||
76: | none => true -- reached end / out of bounds is checked at runtime, statically we halt checking
|
||||
77: | some instr =>
|
||||
78: match instr with
|
||||
79: | .halt => true
|
||||
80: | .jump target =>
|
||||
81: if target < prog.length then loop target stack locals f
|
||||
82: else false
|
||||
83: | .jumpIf target =>
|
||||
84: match stack with
|
||||
85: | .bool :: xs =>
|
||||
86: if target < prog.length then
|
||||
87: loop (pc + 1) xs locals f && loop target xs locals f
|
||||
88: else false
|
||||
89: | _ => false
|
||||
90: | _ =>
|
||||
91: match checkInstr instr stack locals with
|
||||
92: | some (stack', locals') => loop (pc + 1) stack' locals' f
|
||||
93: | none => false
|
||||
94: loop 0 initStack initLocals (prog.length + 1)
|
||||
95:
|
||||
96: end SilverSight.AVMIsa
|
||||
361
formal/SilverSight/AVMIsa/TypeSafety.lean
Normal file
361
formal/SilverSight/AVMIsa/TypeSafety.lean
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
|
|||
-- AVM ISA v1 (Lean-only): Type Safety Proofs
|
||||
2:
|
||||
3: import SilverSight.AVMIsa.TypeCheck
|
||||
4: import SilverSight.AVMIsa.Step
|
||||
5:
|
||||
6: namespace SilverSight.AVMIsa
|
||||
7:
|
||||
8: /-- Relation asserting that stack values match the expected stack type signature. -/
|
||||
9: inductive StackMatches : List AnyVal → List AvmTy → Prop where
|
||||
10: | nil : StackMatches [] []
|
||||
11: | cons {ty : AvmTy} (val : AvmVal ty) {vs : List AnyVal} {tys : List AvmTy}
|
||||
12: (h : StackMatches vs tys) : StackMatches (⟨ty, val⟩ :: vs) (ty :: tys)
|
||||
13:
|
||||
14: /-- Relation asserting that a local frame matches the expected local types. -/
|
||||
15: inductive OptionMatches : Option AnyVal → Option AvmTy → Prop where
|
||||
16: | none : OptionMatches none none
|
||||
17: | some {ty : AvmTy} (val : AvmVal ty) : OptionMatches (some ⟨ty, val⟩) (some ty)
|
||||
18:
|
||||
19: def LocalsMatches (locals : List (Option AnyVal)) (signatures : List (Option AvmTy)) : Prop :=
|
||||
20: locals.length = signatures.length ∧
|
||||
21: ∀ i, OptionMatches (locals.getD i none) (signatures.getD i none)
|
||||
22:
|
||||
23: /-- Helper: pop1 matches. -/
|
||||
24: theorem pop1_safety {vs : List AnyVal} {tys : List AvmTy} (h : StackMatches vs tys) :
|
||||
25: match vs with
|
||||
26: | [] => False
|
||||
27: | x :: xs =>
|
||||
28: ∃ ty tys', tys = ty :: tys' ∧ x.ty = ty ∧ StackMatches xs tys' := by
|
||||
29: cases h with
|
||||
30: | nil => contradiction
|
||||
31: | cons val h' =>
|
||||
32: refine ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl, h'⟩
|
||||
33:
|
||||
34: /-- Safety of checkPrim: if checkPrim succeeds, evalPrim is safe and type-matches. -/
|
||||
35: theorem evalPrim_safety {p : Prim} {s : State} {tys : List AvmTy}
|
||||
36: {tys' : List AvmTy} (hstack : StackMatches s.stack tys)
|
||||
37: (hprim : checkPrim p tys = some tys') :
|
||||
38: ∃ s', evalPrim p s = Outcome.ok s' ∧ StackMatches s'.stack tys' := by
|
||||
39: cases p <;> cases tys <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
40: case not tys_tail =>
|
||||
41: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
42: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
43: cases ty <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
44: -- tys = bool :: tys_tail'
|
||||
45: cases hstack with
|
||||
46: | cons val h' =>
|
||||
47: cases val
|
||||
48: -- val is AvmVal.b
|
||||
49: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
50: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.bool :: tys_tail' := by aesop
|
||||
51: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
52: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
53: rw [heq]
|
||||
54: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.b _) h'
|
||||
55: case and tys_tail =>
|
||||
56: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
57: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
58: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
59: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
60: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
61: -- both are bool
|
||||
62: cases hstack with
|
||||
63: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
64: cases h1 with
|
||||
65: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
66: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
67: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
68: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.bool :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
69: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
70: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
71: rw [heq]
|
||||
72: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.b _) h2
|
||||
73: case or tys_tail =>
|
||||
74: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
75: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
76: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
77: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
78: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
79: cases hstack with
|
||||
80: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
81: cases h1 with
|
||||
82: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
83: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
84: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
85: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.bool :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
86: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
87: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
88: rw [heq]
|
||||
89: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.b _) h2
|
||||
90: case addSatQ0 tys_tail =>
|
||||
91: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
92: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
93: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
94: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
95: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
96: cases hstack with
|
||||
97: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
98: cases h1 with
|
||||
99: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
100: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
101: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
102: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.q0_16 :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
103: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
104: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
105: rw [heq]
|
||||
106: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.q0 _) h2
|
||||
107: case subSatQ0 tys_tail =>
|
||||
108: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
109: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
110: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
111: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
112: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
113: cases hstack with
|
||||
114: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
115: cases h1 with
|
||||
116: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
117: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
118: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
119: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.q0_16 :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
120: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
121: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
122: rw [heq]
|
||||
123: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.q0 _) h2
|
||||
124: case addSatQ16 tys_tail =>
|
||||
125: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
126: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
127: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
128: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
129: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
130: cases hstack with
|
||||
131: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
132: cases h1 with
|
||||
133: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
134: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
135: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
136: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.q16_16 :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
137: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
138: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
139: rw [heq]
|
||||
140: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.q16 _) h2
|
||||
141: case subSatQ16 tys_tail =>
|
||||
142: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
143: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
144: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
145: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
146: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
147: cases hstack with
|
||||
148: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
149: cases h1 with
|
||||
150: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
151: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
152: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
153: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.q16_16 :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
154: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
155: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
156: rw [heq]
|
||||
157: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.q16 _) h2
|
||||
158: case mulSatQ16 tys_tail =>
|
||||
159: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
160: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
161: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
162: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
163: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
164: cases hstack with
|
||||
165: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
166: cases h1 with
|
||||
167: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
168: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
169: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
170: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.q16_16 :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
171: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
172: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
173: rw [heq]
|
||||
174: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.q16 _) h2
|
||||
175: case divSatQ16 tys_tail =>
|
||||
176: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
177: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
178: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
179: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
180: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
181: cases hstack with
|
||||
182: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
183: cases h1 with
|
||||
184: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
185: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
186: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
187: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.q16_16 :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
188: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
189: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
190: rw [heq]
|
||||
191: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.q16 _) h2
|
||||
192: case ltQ16 tys_tail =>
|
||||
193: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
194: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
195: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
196: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
197: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
198: cases hstack with
|
||||
199: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
200: cases h1 with
|
||||
201: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
202: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
203: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
204: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.bool :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
205: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
206: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
207: rw [heq]
|
||||
208: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.b _) h2
|
||||
209: case eqQ16 tys_tail =>
|
||||
210: cases tys_tail <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
211: case cons ty tys_tail' =>
|
||||
212: cases tys_tail' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
213: case cons ty' tys_tail'' =>
|
||||
214: cases ty <;> cases ty' <;> try (unfold checkPrim at hprim; contradiction)
|
||||
215: cases hstack with
|
||||
216: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
217: cases h1 with
|
||||
218: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
219: cases val1; cases val2
|
||||
220: unfold checkPrim at hprim
|
||||
221: have heq : tys' = AvmTy.bool :: tys_tail'' := by aesop
|
||||
222: unfold evalPrim pop1 push1
|
||||
223: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_⟩
|
||||
224: rw [heq]
|
||||
225: exact StackMatches.cons (AvmVal.b _) h2
|
||||
226:
|
||||
227: /-- Locals lookup safety helper. -/
|
||||
228: theorem getLocal_safety {locals : List (Option AnyVal)} {signatures : List (Option AvmTy)}
|
||||
229: (h : LocalsMatches locals signatures) {i : Nat} {ty : AvmTy}
|
||||
230: (hloc : signatures[i]? = some (some ty)) :
|
||||
231: ∃ val : AvmVal ty, getLocal? { pc := 0, stack := [], locals := locals, halted := false } i = some ⟨ty, val⟩ := by
|
||||
232: obtain ⟨hlen, hforall⟩ := h
|
||||
233: have hsig_eq : signatures.getD i none = some ty := by
|
||||
234: rw [List.getD_eq_get?_getD]
|
||||
235: simp [hloc]
|
||||
236: have hmatches := hforall i
|
||||
237: rw [hsig_eq] at hmatches
|
||||
238: cases hmatches with
|
||||
239: | some val =>
|
||||
240: use val
|
||||
241: unfold getLocal?
|
||||
242: rw [List.getD_eq_get?_getD]
|
||||
243: -- Since OptionMatches (locals.getD i none) (some ty) was some val,
|
||||
244: -- locals.getD i none must be some ⟨ty, val⟩.
|
||||
245: have hlocal_eq : locals.getD i none = some ⟨ty, val⟩ := rfl
|
||||
246: rw [← hlocal_eq]
|
||||
247: congr
|
||||
248:
|
||||
249: /-- Locals update safety helper. -/
|
||||
250: theorem setLocal_safety {locals : List (Option AnyVal)} {signatures : List (Option AvmTy)}
|
||||
251: (h : LocalsMatches locals signatures) {i : Nat} {ty : AvmTy} (val : AvmVal ty)
|
||||
252: (hbound : i < signatures.length) :
|
||||
253: LocalsMatches (List.set locals i (some ⟨ty, val⟩)) (List.set signatures i (some ty)) := by
|
||||
254: obtain ⟨hlen, hforall⟩ := h
|
||||
255: constructor
|
||||
256: · simp [hlen]
|
||||
257: · intro j
|
||||
258: by_cases hj : j = i
|
||||
259: · subst hj
|
||||
260: -- j = i
|
||||
261: rw [List.getD_set_self (by omega), List.getD_set_self hbound]
|
||||
262: exact OptionMatches.some val
|
||||
263: · -- j ≠ i
|
||||
264: rw [List.getD_set_ne _ _ hj, List.getD_set_ne _ _ hj]
|
||||
265: exact hforall j
|
||||
266:
|
||||
267: /-- Type preservation theorem for single instruction step. -/
|
||||
268: theorem step_preservation {instr : Instr} {s : State} {tys : List AvmTy} {tys_locals : List (Option AvmTy)}
|
||||
269: (hstack : StackMatches s.stack tys) (hlocals : LocalsMatches s.locals tys_locals)
|
||||
270: {tys' : List AvmTy} {tys_locals' : List (Option AvmTy)}
|
||||
271: (hcheck : checkInstr instr tys tys_locals = some (tys', tys_locals'))
|
||||
272: (hnon_jump : match instr with | .jump _ | .jumpIf _ | .halt => False | _ => True) :
|
||||
273: ∃ s', step [instr] s = Outcome.ok s' ∧ StackMatches s'.stack tys' ∧ LocalsMatches s'.locals tys_locals' := by
|
||||
274: cases instr
|
||||
275: case push val =>
|
||||
276: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
277: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
278: subst hst hloc
|
||||
279: unfold step pop1 push1
|
||||
280: refine ⟨_, rfl, StackMatches.cons val.val hstack, hlocals⟩
|
||||
281: case pop =>
|
||||
282: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
283: split at hcheck
|
||||
284: case h_1 x xs heq =>
|
||||
285: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
286: subst hst hloc
|
||||
287: cases hstack
|
||||
288: unfold step pop1
|
||||
289: refine ⟨_, rfl, by assumption, hlocals⟩
|
||||
290: case h_2 heq => contradiction
|
||||
291: case dup =>
|
||||
292: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
293: split at hcheck
|
||||
294: case h_1 x xs heq =>
|
||||
295: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
296: subst hst hloc
|
||||
297: cases hstack with
|
||||
298: | cons val h' =>
|
||||
299: unfold step pop1
|
||||
300: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_, hlocals⟩
|
||||
301: exact StackMatches.cons val (StackMatches.cons val h')
|
||||
302: case h_2 heq => contradiction
|
||||
303: case swap =>
|
||||
304: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
305: split at hcheck
|
||||
306: case h_1 x y xs heq =>
|
||||
307: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
308: subst hst hloc
|
||||
309: cases hstack with
|
||||
310: | cons val1 h1 =>
|
||||
311: cases h1 with
|
||||
312: | cons val2 h2 =>
|
||||
313: unfold step pop1
|
||||
314: refine ⟨_, rfl, ?_, hlocals⟩
|
||||
315: exact StackMatches.cons val2 (StackMatches.cons val1 h2)
|
||||
316: case h_2 heq => contradiction
|
||||
317: case load i =>
|
||||
318: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
319: split at hcheck
|
||||
320: case h_1 ty heq =>
|
||||
321: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
322: subst hst hloc
|
||||
323: obtain ⟨val, hloc_val⟩ := getLocal_safety hlocals heq
|
||||
324: unfold step pop1
|
||||
325: refine ⟨_, ?_, ?_, hlocals⟩
|
||||
326: · unfold getLocal?; rw [hloc_val]; rfl
|
||||
327: · exact StackMatches.cons val hstack
|
||||
328: case h_2 heq => contradiction
|
||||
329: case store i =>
|
||||
330: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
331: split at hcheck
|
||||
332: case inl hbound =>
|
||||
333: split at hcheck
|
||||
334: case h_1 ty tys_tail heq =>
|
||||
335: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
336: subst hst hloc
|
||||
337: cases hstack with
|
||||
338: | cons val h' =>
|
||||
339: unfold step pop1 setLocal
|
||||
340: obtain ⟨hlen, _⟩ := hlocals
|
||||
341: have hbound_locals : i < s.locals.length := by omega
|
||||
342: rw [if_pos hbound_locals]
|
||||
343: refine ⟨_, rfl, h', setLocal_safety hlocals val hbound⟩
|
||||
344: case h_2 heq => contradiction
|
||||
345: case inr hbound => contradiction
|
||||
346: case jump target => contradiction
|
||||
347: case jumpIf target => contradiction
|
||||
348: case prim p =>
|
||||
349: unfold checkInstr at hcheck
|
||||
350: split at hcheck
|
||||
351: case h_1 stack' heq =>
|
||||
352: injection hcheck with hst hloc
|
||||
353: subst hst hloc
|
||||
354: obtain ⟨s', heval, hst'⟩ := evalPrim_safety hstack heq
|
||||
355: unfold step
|
||||
356: refine ⟨s', ?_, hst', hlocals⟩
|
||||
357: rw [heval]
|
||||
358: case h_2 heq => contradiction
|
||||
359: case halt => contradiction
|
||||
360:
|
||||
361: end SilverSight.AVMIsa
|
||||
|
|
@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ lean_lib «SilverSightRRC» where
|
|||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.Instr,
|
||||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.State,
|
||||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.Step,
|
||||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.TypeCheck,
|
||||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.TypeSafety,
|
||||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.Run,
|
||||
`SilverSight.AVMIsa.Emit,
|
||||
`RRCLib.RRCEmit
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue