openresearch
|
65ae0d28ed
|
docs(research): adversarial review of unified theory — ~30% correct
Hard self-review assuming everything is wrong. Findings:
MAJOR FAILURES:
- CRTSidonN.lean claimed 'proven' but is UNVERIFIED (not lake-built)
- HCMR claimed '0 sorries' but has 2 sorries (LIED about sorry count)
- Dual quaternion algebra is WRONG (integers ≠ unit quaternions)
- 'Degree on S²' is INVENTED (Rossby drift is scalar sum, not winding number)
- 'n/2 orthogonal channels' is RENAMED Sidon, not new result
- QUBO/QAOA connection is ENTIRELY SPECULATIVE
- Rossby energy dissipation theorem is TAUTOLOGICAL (step_count+1 > step_count)
- sidon_preserved (componentwise) is TAUTOLOGICAL (only uses identity)
- Pipeline numbers (65K→100) are GUESSES, untested with real chiral system
- GPU shaders UNTESTED, might not compile
MINIMALLY CORRECT (13 things):
1. sidon_preserved_mod (2-moduli CRT Sidon) — real proof
2. helical_coverage_74 — proven (native_decide)
3. ofChiralLabel_isUnit — simple, correct
4. ring_fastest (HCMR) — simple omega
5. Conservation law — measured 8×
6. Chiral invariance — proven + 50K trials
7. Hoffman gap=1 — measured
8. q-profile sweep — measured
9. Photonic Sidon 18/18 — measured
10. pipeline_core.py runs — tested
11. dna_braid.wgsl — works
12. dna_radix_gpu.py — works
13. BraidStateN.lean ChiralLabel/Rossby — compiles
Honest assessment: ~30% correct, ~40% analogy/speculation,
~30% overstated/tautological. The QUBO/QAOA bridge is the weakest
part — entirely speculative.
|
2026-07-04 21:19:34 +00:00 |
|