# Spectral Codebook Generator **Date:** 2026-07-01 **Module:** `python/spectral_codebook.py` **Output:** `data/spectral_codebook.json` **Tests:** `tests/test_spectral_codebook.py` (43 tests) Implements the "Next Steps" of `docs/SPECTRAL_CODEBOOK_ANALYSIS.md`: a gap-aware spectral codebook over the 250 8×8 integer braid adjacency matrices in `formal/SilverSight/PIST/Matrices250.lean`, with an encode/decode round trip and an exact, float-free fingerprint per matrix. ## Usage ```sh python3 python/spectral_codebook.py # build + report + write JSON python3 python/spectral_codebook.py --check-manifold # also run the 278-row corpus python3 python/spectral_codebook.py --gap-factor 3 --min-support 10 --no-write python3 python/spectral_codebook.py --cartan-floor # + Fisher/Δ=17/1792 floor report python3 tests/test_spectral_codebook.py # or python3 -m pytest tests/test_spectral_codebook.py ``` Pure stdlib (`fractions.Fraction` for exactness). NumPy is used only as an optional fast path for the spectral radius; without it, a Durand–Kerner root finder runs on the exact integer characteristic polynomial (verified to agree with NumPy to 4dp in the test suite). API: `build_codebook()` returns a `Codebook` with `encode(matrix) → (codeword, index)`, `decode(codeword, index) → equation_id`, `codeword_of(equation_id)`, `cluster_table()`, and `collision_report()`. ## What changed vs. the original concept 1. **Exact char-poly fingerprint replaces float λ as primary key.** Each matrix gets the 8 exact integer coefficients of det(λI − M), computed by Faddeev–LeVerrier in exact rational arithmetic (integrality of every coefficient is asserted; Cayley–Hamilton p(M) = 0 is checked in integer arithmetic in the tests). This is strictly finer than 4dp λ — see the measured collision numbers below — and involves no floats at all. 2. **Power-iteration λ is demoted to a traceability field.** The analysis doc's 9 "mid band / edge-of-chaos" values in (0.5, 1) are power-iteration **non-convergence artifacts**: all 9 matrices have exact spectral radius ρ = 1.0 (peripheral spectra — several eigenvalues of modulus 1, including complex pairs). The C1 "edge-of-chaos" cluster of the analysis doc therefore does not exist; those matrices belong to the ρ = 1 class. `spectral_radius` in the new JSON is the exact max root modulus of the char poly; the legacy estimate is kept as `lambda_power_iteration`. Measured: 18 of 250 entries have |λ_pi − ρ| > 1e-3. 3. **Dedupe before gap analysis.** The corpus has only **238 distinct matrices** over 250 ids (11 groups of byte-identical duplicates, 23 ids involved). Gap statistics and cluster support are computed over distinct matrices; duplicates are listed per entry (`identical_matrix_ids`) and in the collision report. 4. **Sample-size guard on gap detection.** Gaps > 3× median gap propose boundaries (30 candidates), but a segment must hold ≥ 10 distinct matrices to stand as a cluster; smaller segments merge into the neighbor across the smaller gap. Points isolated above a suppressed gap with < 10 occupancy are flagged `sparse_tail: true` (outliers, not clusters): the region above λ ≈ 7.66 holds only 10 ids (and only 4 above λ = 11 — {11.68, 16.56, 16.99, 16.99}), far too few to assert cluster structure. ## Measured numbers (250 ids / 238 distinct matrices) ### Fingerprint uniqueness / collisions | Fingerprint | Unique values | Ids uniquely identified | Collision groups (ids) | |---|---|---|---| | λ (exact, 4dp) | 179 | 164 / 250 | 15 (86 ids) | | char poly (exact ℤ⁸) | **196** | **183 / 250** | 13 (67 ids) | | raw matrix bytes | 238 | 227 / 250 | 11 (23 ids) | - Exact duplicate matrices: **11 groups, 23 ids** (12 ids are copies of another id's matrix). No encoder can separate these; `encode` returns the canonical (first-sorted) entry and the JSON lists the twins. - **Cospectral non-identical groups: 6** — same char poly, different matrices. The largest is the nilpotent class x⁸ (35 ids / 31 distinct matrices, all ρ = 0); the others are `-1,0,…` (5 ids), `0,0,-1,0,…` (6 ids), `-1,-1,0,-1,…` (3 ids), and two pairs. - The 4dp-λ count differs from the analysis doc's 190 because the 9 artifact values collapse onto ρ = 1.0 once computed exactly. - **Neither λ nor the char poly is injective** — the round-trip decode key is the within-cluster rank index, and all collision classes are explicit in `data/spectral_codebook.json` (`collisions.charpoly_collision_classes`, `collisions.duplicate_matrix_classes`). ### Cluster table (gap factor 3.0, min support 10) Median gap 0.021671 → threshold 0.065013; 30 candidate boundaries, 8 kept: `[0.5, 1.0744, 1.4599, 2.7251, 3.3598, 3.7311, 4.3264, 6.1266]`; sparse-tail cutoff λ = 7.6568. | Codeword | Ids | Distinct | λ range | Note | |---|---|---|---|---| | C0 | 35 | 31 | 0.0 | nilpotent class (char poly x⁸) | | C1 | 20 | 20 | [1.0, 1.000003] | peripheral-unit class (incl. the 9 mis-measured) | | C2 | 13 | 13 | [1.1487, 1.4253] | | | C3 | 79 | 77 | [1.4945, 2.6919] | bulk | | C4 | 29 | 28 | [2.7583, 3.2910] | | | C5 | 15 | 14 | [3.4287, 3.6970] | | | C6 | 22 | 20 | [3.7651, 4.2889] | | | C7 | 19 | 18 | [4.3639, 5.8789] | | | C8 | 18 | 17 | [6.3743, 16.9915] | 10 sparse-tail outliers above 7.6568 | The three structurally defensible regions are ρ = 0 (nilpotent), ρ = 1 (peripheral unit), and the ρ > 1 bulk; the finer C2–C8 boundaries are gap-supported but data-driven, and the high tail is outlier territory. ### Round trip `decode ∘ encode` verified over all 250 equations: bijective on (codeword, index) pairs; `encode(matrix)` recovers the exact equation id for all 227 ids with unique matrices and a byte-identical matrix for the 23 duplicate-group ids. ### 278-row manifold (`formal/SilverSight/RRC/Q16_16Manifold.lean`) 278 rows resolve to **250 unique equation ids** — the 28 extra rows are repeated ids reusing matrices already in the codebook (238 distinct matrices, no id lacks a matrix). Rerunning gap quantization on the 278-row corpus reproduces the 250-matrix boundaries exactly: **no new gaps, no new clusters, all extra rows fall inside existing clusters.** ## Φ-corkscrew and Cartan layers (f/Cartan integration batch) Four layers added on top of the fingerprints, each labelled **exact** (integer arithmetic, Lean-provable) or **decorative** (placement/reporting only, carries no information): ### 1. Integer spiral-index packing — EXACT `pack_spiral_index` / `unpack_spiral_index` with corpus-wide parameters recorded in the JSON header (`phi_corkscrew.packing`): offset = max|c| over all fingerprint coefficients (164 234 on this corpus), base = 2·offset + 1 (328 469). Digits are offset-encoded (`c + offset ∈ [0, base)`), so `spiral_index = Σ (cᵢ + offset)·baseⁱ` is the base-B positional numeral of the fingerprint — injective on fingerprints by uniqueness of positional representation, inverted exactly by `unpack_spiral_index`, and verified by round trip over all 250 matrices in the test suite. It inherits charpoly's non-injectivity on *matrices* (cospectral classes share one index), so identity still requires the within-cluster index. This **supersedes** the float phinary packing that `integration_sprint.py` used historically (`phinary += c·φ⁻ⁱ` then truncation — not injective). The integer path in `integration_sprint.phi_corkscrew_index` is fixed the same way (offset-encoded digits; its unoffset signed packing collapsed e.g. `(-1, 1)` with `(1, 0)` in base 2), but its base is per-call — for corpus-comparable indices use the codebook's recorded (base, offset). ### 2. f(n) layout — DECORATIVE `f(n) = (√n·cos(nψ), √n·sin(nψ))`, ψ = 2π/φ². Injective because 1/φ² is irrational; low-discrepancy by the three-distance theorem; information-neutral (everything decodes from `spiral_index` alone). Each entry stores `layout.radius_sq` (= the spiral index, exact int) and `layout.angle_frac` (fraction of a full turn). Angles are computed in `decimal` arithmetic at full precision because spiral indices reach ~10⁴⁴ ≫ 2⁵², where float64 retains no fractional bits of n/φ². Verified against `VERIFICATION_LOG.md` V007: f(20121) = (−137.80079576, −33.64432624). Measured minimum pairwise angular separation across the corpus: ≈ 4.64 × 10⁻⁶ of a turn (positive, as irrationality requires). ### 3. Cartan ∆-floor quantization (`--cartan-floor`) — EXACT ∆, reported floor ∆ = **17/1792** exactly (λ_min of the Cartan crossing blocks, `CartanConnection.lean:70`, `docs/cartan_fingerprint.md`), adopted as the resolution floor on the Fisher metric of Δ₇: `d_F(p, q) = 2·arccos(Σ√(pᵢqᵢ))` with `pᵢ = |cᵢ|/Σ|cⱼ|` (all-zero fingerprint → uniform, by convention). Measured on this corpus: **13 fingerprint pairs fall below ∆**, merging 196 fingerprints into **187 ∆-resolution codewords**, vs **9 clusters** from the 3×-median-gap λ rule. Both rules are emitted side by side; neither replaces the other. Caveat, asserted in the tests: the simplex projection destroys sign and scale, so distinct fingerprints can collide on Δ₇ (this corpus has a pair at Fisher distance exactly 0). The Fisher/∆ layer is a **similarity** metric, not an identity key. ### 4. Torus-winding saturation fix — EXACT `pist_braid_bridge.TorusWinding` now carries `a_exact`/`b_exact` (plain ℤ, no clamp) alongside the legacy Q16.16 raws, which silently saturate above 32767 (i.e. for spiral_index > 65535 — and codebook indices reach ~10⁴⁴). `torus_to_spiral_index` prefers the exact fields, making the round trip lossless for every index (regression-tested at n = 10⁹); legacy windings without exact fields keep the old Q16 behaviour. The matching Lean type in `BraidEigensolid.lean` needs the same widening (Int fields alongside Q16_16) before this layer can be mirrored formally — noted in the dataclass docstring, Lean file intentionally untouched. ## Notes for the Lean side - **Identity layer vs. similarity layer.** `ClassifyN.hashMatrix` is a positional base-5 hash, but corpus entries reach **9**, so injectivity is not provable (positional carries can collide). Using base ≥ max_entry + 1 (e.g. 10) makes injectivity trivial to prove. Recommended split: the positional hash (base ≥ 10) is the *identity* key; the exact char-poly fingerprint is the *similarity/clustering* key (invariant under permutation-relabelling of strands, unlike the hash). - **Threshold mismatch.** `ClassifyN.lean` defines `signalThreshold = 98304` (1.5 in Q16.16) and `oberthHighThreshold = 262144` (4.0), but `docs/SPECTRAL_CODEBOOK_ANALYSIS.md` claims the post-fix thresholds are 0.5/1.0. The code and the analysis doc disagree; this generator matches neither silently — it emits the gap-derived boundaries above and flags the discrepancy here for resolution. ## Neon data layer (neon-64gb) `python/spectral_codebook_db.py` syncs the codebook into the ENE schema on the neon-64gb Postgres (`$NEON_PG`, default `postgres://postgres:postgres@100.92.88.64:5432/research_stack` — same convention as `scripts/auto/auto_pipeline.py`). ```sh python3 python/spectral_codebook_db.py # DRY RUN (default): summary + sample SQL, writes nothing python3 python/spectral_codebook.py --sync-db # same dry run from the generator CLI python3 python/spectral_codebook_db.py --verify-schema # + READ-ONLY column check against the live DB python3 python/spectral_codebook_db.py --emit-sql # write data/spectral_codebook_sync.sql (no DB contact) python3 python/spectral_codebook_db.py --apply # actually upsert (psycopg2, or falls back to --emit-sql) ``` The default is always a dry run; only an explicit `--apply` writes to the database. `--apply` has **not** been run — `ene.rrc_predictions` is untouched as of this writing. Live-DB access (even read-only `--verify-schema`) requires the user's go-ahead per the standing "ask before any DB work" rule; schema compatibility was instead verified offline against `scripts/auto/ene_schema.sql` (tested). ### Landing table: `ene.rrc_predictions` (empty — natural target) One flat, SQL-typed row per equation (deterministic uuid5 ids, so reruns upsert idempotently): | Column | Value | |---|---| | `id` | uuid5(namespace, equation_id) | | `equation_id` | e.g. `rrc_eq_01ab6e9c32652d06` | | `proxy_pred` | gap-aware cluster codeword `C0`–`C8` | | `exact_pred` | shape from exact λ under the **current** ClassifyN thresholds (1.5/4.0 Q16.16, integer semantics mirrored) | | `matrix_hash` | `charpoly=;pos10=` — exact char-poly (similarity key) + base-10 positional hash (identity key; injective, entries ≤ 9) | | `confidence` | 1.0 for unique char-poly fingerprints; 1/k in a k-way collision class | Dry-run counts: 250 rows — per cluster C0=35, C1=20, C2=13, C3=79, C4=29, C5=15, C6=22, C7=19, C8=18; per shape LogogramProjection=69, SignalShapedRouteCompiler=131, CognitiveLoadField=50; confidence 1.0 for 183 rows, <1.0 for 67. ### Spark path The row shape is deliberately flat so the Spark cluster on neon-64gb (master `spark://100.92.88.64:7077`, podman spark-worker, JDBC `postgresql-42.7.5`) can read it directly, the same JDBC pattern the auto-pipeline Spark analysis uses for `ene.scars` (11 rows) and `ene.routes` (5 rows): ```python df = (spark.read.format("jdbc") .option("url", "jdbc:postgresql://100.92.88.64:5432/research_stack") .option("dbtable", "ene.rrc_predictions") .option("user", "postgres").option("password", "postgres") .option("driver", "org.postgresql.Driver") .load()) df.groupBy("proxy_pred", "exact_pred").count().orderBy("proxy_pred").show() ``` ### Table map & staleness findings | Table | Rows | Status | |---|---|---| | `ene.rrc_classifications` | 120 | **STALE** — all `spectral_radius` values are 0.3–0.85, i.e. old flat-regime power-iteration artifacts, classified 2026-07-01 05:11 *before* the exact-eigenvalue correction (this codebook shows real ρ ∈ {0} ∪ {1} ∪ (1, 17]; the corpus has nothing in (0, 1)). Equation ids there are `lean:formal/...` paths, not `rrc_eq_*` hashes. **Recommend re-classification via this codebook** and reconciling the id conventions. | | `ene.rrc_predictions` | 0 | Empty — landing table for this sync (`matrix_hash` column already fits the fingerprint). | | `ene.shape_predictions` | 100 | Existing shape model output; `exact_pred` here can serve as cross-check. | | `ene.shape_ground_truth` | 0 | Empty. | | `ene.eigensolid_snapshots` | 0 | Empty (root_hash, crossing_matrix, sidon_slack, residual_series, …) — future home for full spectral profiles. | | `ene.braid_strands`, `ene.receipts`, `ene.sidon_labels` | 0 | Empty. | | `ene.scars` / `ene.routes` | 11 / 5 | Read by the Spark cluster via JDBC (auto-pipeline `--spark`). | (Row counts and staleness ranges as enumerated by the coordinating agent on 2026-07-01; re-check with `--verify-schema` + read-only SELECTs before acting on them.) ### arxiv-pg citation layer A separate Postgres runs in the `arxiv-pg` container on neon-64gb (arxiv DB with pgvector, `concept_citations`). It has **no published port** — access is podman-exec only. It is the citation/grounding layer for equation provenance; this sync does not (and cannot) connect to it. ### Gremlin graph layer (Cosmos DB mathblob/concepts) `python/spectral_codebook_gremlin.py` loads the codebook into the Azure Cosmos DB Gremlin graph used by the Research Stack module/concept loaders (credentials in `Research Stack/.env.gremlin`, same conventions as `load_module_graph.py`). Dry-run by default; `--apply` upserts. Model: 1 `codebook` provenance vertex, 9 `codeword` cluster vertices, 13 `fingerprint` vertices (cospectral collision classes only), 250 `equation` vertices (ids verbatim; spiral_index stored as string — it exceeds int64), with `has_codeword` / `in_cluster` / `shares_fingerprint` / `within_cartan_floor(fisher_distance)` edges. First applied 2026-07-02: 273 vertices + 339 edges, all ok; the 250 equation vertices already existed in the graph and were refreshed in place with exact values. Spark-side availability of the synced rows was verified the same day by a client-mode PySpark 3.5.5 job (JDK 17 via nix, driver on the tailnet, `spark.driver.host` set) reading `ene.rrc_predictions` through JDBC from the spark://100.92.88.64:7077 cluster: 250 rows, C0–C8 and shape counts matching the sync exactly. CouchDB (:5984) remains unresponsive — nothing loaded there. ## Output schema (`data/spectral_codebook.json`) - header: `schema` (`spectral_codebook_v2`), `phi_corkscrew` (packing base/offset + layout semantics and measured min angular separation), `quantization` (factor, min support, median gap, kept/candidate/suppressed boundaries, sparse-tail cutoff), `clusters` (table above), `collisions` (all counts and explicit collision classes), `manifold_278` (when `--check-manifold`), `cartan_floor` (when `--cartan-floor`: sub-Δ Fisher pairs, Δ-resolution codeword count, rule comparison). - `entries[]`: `equation_id`, `codeword`, `index`, `spectral_radius` (exact), `lambda_power_iteration` (legacy), `charpoly` (8 exact ints), `density`, `frobenius`, `trace`, `spiral_index` (exact int packing of charpoly), `layout` (`radius_sq`, `angle_frac`), optional `sparse_tail`, optional `identical_matrix_ids`.