Ramanujan Challenge Problem 2.8 Solution & Proof
allaun
3702a638ad
Scored against the challenge's operative standard (section 4: a CAS-based
symbolic derivation is sufficient evidence) and its stated central risk
(section 1: retrieval vs reasoning), not a generic rigour bar.
Verdict: satisfies and exceeds the evidentiary standard. Findings:
F1 CRITICAL run_checks.sh exits 1 on any machine WITH SageMath installed;
set -euo pipefail makes the declared-optional Sage cross-checks
fatal, so the script passes without the optional tooling and
fails with it
F2 MEDIUM false assertion at p28_lattice_hypotheses_certificate.sage:107 --
component 1 is 216+154x as written, true value 216+262x
(b2=(1,2,1,0) contributes 216x, not 108x). Non-load-bearing:
the identity below it, Bcomb == 4x*Crow, is TRUE and Crow
reproduces the manuscript's C(x) exactly
F3 MEDIUM Sage 10.9 parent-coercion TypeError at line 43 masks F2
F4 MEDIUM novel-vs-imported content not stated plainly, though the
Chudnovsky import itself is cited precisely
F5 PASS proves the officially stated claim about the official object
F6 PASS evidence exceeds the section-4 standard, and is falsifiable
F7 PASS manuscript builds clean: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 17 pages
None of F1-F3 touches the mathematics; all are certificate plumbing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WY6SfRYvm8zFKMX9GcjS8u
|
||
|---|---|---|
| docs/proofs | ||
| experiments/ramanujan_28/submission | ||