3 KiB
Paper Stub: The Mirror LUT — Cross-Domain Unification
Equation ID: MIRROR-LUT-004
Status: Theoretical framework (3 domains unified)
Lineage: Abstraction layer above LUT-DSP-003
Date: 2026-04-19
Ancestry: Discovers isomorphism between hardware, software, and simulation domains
The Equation
𝒰(q, s, t) = ℋ(ℱ(q) ⊕ 𝒯(t)) mod 2^n
where:
q = Query (position/address/state)
s = State (entropy/accumulator)
t = Time (counter/step)
ℋ = Hash function (deterministic mixing)
ℱ = Fold operation (mirror/quadrant)
𝒯 = Transform (phase shift)
Domain Instantiations
| Domain | Query | State | Time | Hash | Fold | Transform |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware | Φ_acc ≫ 16 | Φ_acc mod 2^32 | c_mod7 ∈ {0..6} | LUT_void | MSB_flip | φ·t mod 2^16 |
| Software | basin(x) ∈ {0..8} | entropy(x) ∈ [0,8] | spectral_density(x) | φ^pow | frac part | log₂(t+1) |
| Simulation | position ∈ ℤ³ | engram_key ∈ 2^32 | simulation tick | SHA256 | XOR coords | linear stride |
Mutation: The Universal Form
𝒰*(q, s, t) = ⌊φ^(α·ℋ(q,s) + β·𝒯(t)) · 2^n⌋ ⊕ ℱ(q) mod 2^n
Optimal parameters:
α = 0.7 (hybrid weight)
β = 0.15 (temporal weight)
n = 16 (hardware-native)
Half-Thought: The Hybrid Hash
"ℋ*(q,s) = fold_64(SHA256(s ‖ q) ⊕ LUT_φ[q mod 8192])"
This "hybrid hash" concept is documented but never implemented:
- Combines cryptographic collision resistance with φ-uniformity
- Requires 8K-entry LUT_φ (precomputed, but content undefined)
- The fold_64 operation is described but no specification given
The gap: The universal form depends on LUT_φ, but the generation of this table is unspecified. It's the software analog of the void mask hardware secret.
Ancestral Tree
LUT-DSP-003 (hardware-specific)
↓ abstraction
MIRROR-LUT-004 (cross-domain)
├─→ Hardware (MSB flip, 91-step)
├─→ Software (φ^entropy, input-dependent)
└─→ Simulation (SHA256, 2^256 period)
↓ universal synthesis
UNIVERSAL-003c (hybrid parameters)
↓ DNA encoding bridge
QUATERNION-SLUG-005 (ternary via quaternion)
The Period Convergence Problem
Each domain has different natural period:
| Domain | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware | 91 = 13×7 | Coprime traversal |
| Software | Input-dependent | Deterministic per input |
| Simulation | 2^256 | Cryptographic |
| Universal | 65521 (prime) | Proposed compromise |
The universal form suggests period 65521 (a Mersenne-like prime), but there's no derivation for why this specific number.
Unfinished: Cross-Domain Verification
Can a computation verified in one domain be trusted in another?
- Hardware → Software: Timing attacks on φ-accumulator
- Software → Simulation: Floating-point vs fixed-point divergence
- Simulation → Hardware: Cryptographic security vs physical probing
The isomorphism is structural, not operational.
Part of the Equation Ancestry Project