mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/Research-Stack.git
synced 2026-08-06 13:05:46 +00:00
209 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
209 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
# Physics Bootcamp Refinement Audit
|
|
|
|
Status: EXTERNAL_REFERENCE
|
|
Date ingested: 2026-05-20
|
|
Source: https://www.physicsbootcamp.org/
|
|
Primary index surface: https://www.physicsbootcamp.org/fundamentals-bootcamp.html
|
|
|
|
## Claim Boundary
|
|
|
|
Physics Bootcamp is used here as a curriculum coverage index, not as an
|
|
authority for new physical claims. The stack already has broad physics equation
|
|
coverage and several Lean physics surfaces; this audit identifies refinement
|
|
gaps where the stack would benefit from explicit receipts, examples, or
|
|
coverage tracking.
|
|
|
|
Do not import prose or implementation from the site. Use the topic map as an
|
|
external checklist.
|
|
|
|
## Local Coverage Snapshot
|
|
|
|
Existing stack surfaces already cover:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Hamiltonian dimensions and dimensional homogeneity:
|
|
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/Semantics/HamiltonianFormal.lean
|
|
|
|
SI constants and unit conversion:
|
|
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/Semantics/SIConstants.lean
|
|
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/Semantics/UnitConversion.lean
|
|
|
|
Mechanics, thermodynamics, E&M, and quantum equation map:
|
|
3-Mathematical-Models/physics_eqs_mapped.md
|
|
|
|
Physical-semantics boundary:
|
|
6-Documentation/docs/physics/PHYSICAL_SEMANTICS_PARADIGM.md
|
|
|
|
Electromagnetic and electrostatic Lean surfaces:
|
|
Semantics.ElectromagneticSpectrum
|
|
Semantics.ElectrostaticsMetaprobe
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Missing Or Underweighted Refinements
|
|
|
|
### 1. Measurement Receipt Layer
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp starts with uncertainty, precision, accuracy, significant figures,
|
|
absolute/relative uncertainty, propagation of uncertainty, order of magnitude,
|
|
and dimensional analysis.
|
|
|
|
Current stack has dimensions and units, but measurement quality is scattered
|
|
across residual/error terms. Add a first-class measurement receipt:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
MeasuredQuantity = value + unit + absoluteUncertainty + relativeUncertainty
|
|
MeasurementReceipt = dimensional_ok + sigfig_policy + propagation_rule
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Suggested future Lean module:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Semantics.MeasurementReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This should be Q16_16/Q0_16 based and avoid floats in compute paths.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Curriculum Coverage Matrix
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp is useful because it is sequential: mechanics -> fluids/waves ->
|
|
thermal physics -> E&M -> optics -> relativity/quantum/atomic/nuclear topics.
|
|
|
|
The stack has many advanced and speculative surfaces but no simple matrix that
|
|
answers:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
topic -> local module -> receipt type -> verified examples -> gaps
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Suggested artifact:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
6-Documentation/docs/physics/PHYSICS_COVERAGE_MATRIX.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This should prevent over-investing in high-level physics while missing basic
|
|
receipts such as frame transforms, units, and measurement propagation.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Noninertial Frame Receipts
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp explicitly separates accelerating frames, rotating frames, Earth-frame
|
|
physics, and Coriolis force.
|
|
|
|
The stack mentions Coriolis in equation maps, but should expose a finite
|
|
receipt surface:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
InertialFrame
|
|
UniformlyAcceleratingFrame
|
|
UniformlyRotatingFrame
|
|
CoriolisTermReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This belongs near rotation, torsion, and shell/PIST frame work. It should be a
|
|
coordinate-transform receipt, not a new physics claim.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Rigid-Body Tensor Receipts
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp separates fixed-axis rotation, moment of inertia, principal axes,
|
|
gyroscope behavior, and kinetic energy about center of mass.
|
|
|
|
The stack has rotation/quaternion/torsion machinery, but the classical rigid
|
|
body interface should have a simple tensor audit:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
InertiaTensorReceipt
|
|
PrincipalAxesReceipt
|
|
ParallelAxisReceipt
|
|
RotationalEnergyReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This is a good bridge between `UnitQuaternion`, GWL/toroidal shells, and
|
|
hardware attitude/control surfaces.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Thermal Transport Before Thermodynamic Abstractions
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp separates thermal expansion, calorimetry, conduction, convection,
|
|
radiation, Newton cooling, black-body radiation, first law, entropy, and kinetic
|
|
theory.
|
|
|
|
The stack has strong entropy and thermodynamic language, but it should keep
|
|
transport receipts separate from global entropy claims:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
ThermalConductionReceipt
|
|
ConvectionBoundaryReceipt
|
|
RadiationBalanceReceipt
|
|
CalorimetryBalanceReceipt
|
|
MeanFreePathReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This matters for hardware, materials, AngrySphinx compute-cost heat budgets, and
|
|
any donated-cycle defense work.
|
|
|
|
### 6. E&M Boundary Receipts
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp proceeds through charge conservation, Coulomb force, potentials,
|
|
conductors as boundaries, method of images, dielectrics, circuits, AC complex
|
|
impedance, displacement current, Maxwell equations, and EM waves.
|
|
|
|
Current stack has EM surfaces, but the boundary-condition receipts should be
|
|
made explicit:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
ConductorBoundaryReceipt
|
|
DielectricResponseReceipt
|
|
ImageChargeReceipt
|
|
ContinuityEquationReceipt
|
|
MaxwellPointFormReceipt
|
|
ComplexImpedanceReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
These are especially useful because they give cheap, checkable examples for
|
|
semantic boundary laws.
|
|
|
|
### 7. Optics As A Routing/Projection Testbed
|
|
|
|
Bootcamp covers Fermat's principle, Snell/refraction, lenses, optical
|
|
instruments, Fresnel equations, polarization, birefringence, interference, and
|
|
interferometers.
|
|
|
|
The stack already has optics references and EM spectra, but optics should be
|
|
treated as a clean projection/routing testbed:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
FermatPathReceipt
|
|
SnellBoundaryReceipt
|
|
FresnelPolarizationReceipt
|
|
ThinFilmInterferenceReceipt
|
|
InterferometerPhaseReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This is directly relevant to semantic routing: least-time path selection,
|
|
boundary impedance mismatch, phase accounting, and projection loss.
|
|
|
|
## Priority Order
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
P0 MeasurementReceipt
|
|
P1 PhysicsCoverageMatrix
|
|
P2 FrameTransformReceipt
|
|
P3 ThermalTransportReceipt
|
|
P4 BoundaryConditionReceipt
|
|
P5 OpticsRoutingReceipt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Integration Rule
|
|
|
|
Use Bootcamp as a checklist for missing receipts, not as a new theory source.
|
|
Every promoted refinement must land as one of:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Lean theorem
|
|
Lean #eval receipt
|
|
Q16_16/Q0_16 checker
|
|
coverage matrix row with HOLD status
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The likely highest-value next implementation is `MeasurementReceipt`: it would
|
|
connect units, uncertainty propagation, significant figures, and dimensional
|
|
analysis into a single gate before physics formulas enter the stack.
|