3.1 KiB
Kernel Boundary SVM/QML Prior
Status: EXTERNAL_REFERENCE_WITH_CANDIDATE_STACK_MAPPING
Sources:
- scikit-learn SVM user guide:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/svm.html - Quantum Machine Learning overview:
https://thequantuminsider.com/2026/05/08/what-is-quantum-machine-learning/
Why This Matters
Support Vector Machines give the stack a clean boundary primitive:
feature field -> margin boundary -> support-vector witnesses -> replayable decision
The useful part is not generic classification. The useful part is that the decision boundary depends on a sparse subset of training points: the support vectors. In Research Stack terms, those support vectors are candidate receipt leaves for the boundary.
This maps naturally to SMN/eigenmass work:
all observed rows/cells
-> kernel feature space
-> support-vector boundary witnesses
-> Mass Number / SMN gate context
-> ADMIT, HOLD, or QUARANTINE
Classical Kernel Surface
SVMs support classification, regression, and outlier/novelty detection. Their strength is high-dimensional boundary finding, especially when the number of dimensions is large. Their risk is overfitting and compute blow-up when kernel choice, regularization, and sample size are not controlled.
For stack use:
| SVM term | Stack mapping |
|---|---|
| Support vector | Boundary witness leaf |
| Margin | Admissibility buffer |
| Kernel | Feature-space projection law |
| Decision function | Route/gate score |
sample_weight / class_weight |
SMN/evidence-load weighting |
| One-class SVM | Outlier / quarantine detector |
Quantum Kernel Surface
The QML article is useful because it describes the same kernel pattern with a different feature-map backend:
classical data
-> quantum feature map / circuit encoding
-> sampled quasi-probabilities
-> kernel matrix
-> classical SVM decision
That makes quantum kernels a possible future kernel backend, not a new claim
class. The stack can keep the same receipt requirements:
kernel backend declared
support witnesses emitted
kernel matrix hash recorded
decision function replayed
negative controls pass
Claim Boundary
Allowed:
- Use classical SVMs as a baseline boundary detector.
- Treat support vectors as sparse boundary receipts.
- Use one-class SVM as a quarantine/outlier prior.
- Treat quantum kernels as an optional future backend for kernel-matrix generation.
HOLD:
- Quantum advantage.
- Commercially relevant QSVM superiority.
- Any hardware quantum claim.
- Any physical mass claim from semantic support vectors.
- Any proof claim without Lean/replay receipts.
First Fixture
Recommended first fixture:
input: DESI/MaNGA joined-cell eigenmass features
label: avalanche-candidate vs non-candidate, or HOLD/ADMIT proxy
baseline: linear SVM and RBF SVM
receipt: support indices, support-vector hash, kernel params, decision scores,
train/test split hash, shuffled-label negative control
decision: ADMIT_FIXTURE or HOLD
The kernel must be treated as a projection law, not as authority. The support vectors are useful only if the replay receipt closes.