6.9 KiB
FPGA Implementation Review Document
Date: 2026-04-26T19:47:00 Purpose: Comprehensive documentation of morphic scalar FPGA implementation for review Status: Implementation complete, pending review approach selection
Question: Which Review Approach?
The FPGA implementation is complete but requires review. Please select one of the following approaches:
Option 1: Lean Theorem Verification
Focus: Complete mathematical proofs in Lean code Files to modify:
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/FPGAExtraction.lean- Completesorryproofs0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/MorphicScalar.lean- Completesorryproofs0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/OEPI.lean- Completesorryproofs0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/OriginProtocol.lean- Completesorryproofs
Current status: All theorems marked as sorry (TODO markers)
Effort: Medium - requires Lean theorem proving expertise
Benefit: Mathematical rigor, AGENTS.md compliance
Option 2: Verilog Simulation
Focus: Run testbench with Verilog simulator Tools required: Icarus Verilog or similar Files to test:
hardware/morphic_scalar_fpga.v- Complete testbench included
Current status: Testbench written, not executed Effort: Low - requires Verilog simulator installation Benefit: Functional verification, timing analysis
Option 3: Synthesis Check
Focus: Test synthesis for target hardware Tools required: Yosys, nextpnr Target hardware: Lattice iCE40 HX8K Files to synthesize:
hardware/morphic_scalar_fpga.v
Current status: Resource estimates calculated, not synthesized Effort: Medium - requires FPGA toolchain setup Benefit: Hardware verification, actual resource usage
Option 4: Formal Verification
Focus: Model checking against Lean specification Tools required: Formal verification tools (e.g., Yosys-SMTBMC) Files to verify:
hardware/morphic_scalar_fpga.v0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/FPGAExtraction.lean(specification)
Current status: Not started Effort: High - requires formal verification expertise Benefit: Mathematical proof of correctness
Current FPGA Implementation State
Files Created
-
hardware/morphic_scalar_fpga.v(570 lines)- Q16.16 fixed-point arithmetic modules
- OEPI calculator with weighted sum
- OEPI threshold classifier
- 16-state scalar state machine
- Amplitude update module
- Profile collapse selector
- Top-level morphic scalar integration
- Complete testbench with 6 test cases
-
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/FPGAExtraction.lean(150 lines)- FPGA target specifications
- Resource utilization estimation
- Verilog module specifications
- Bind instance for resource estimation
- Theorems (marked as
sorry):ice40SufficientResourcesoepiLinearComplexityfiniteStateMachineStates
- #eval examples for testing
-
docs/FPGA_MORPHIC_SCALAR_SPEC.md(200 lines)- Architecture overview
- Resource utilization table
- Module descriptions
- Performance metrics
- Verification plan
- Integration with existing FPGA Warden Node
Architecture Summary
Target Hardware: Lattice iCE40 HX8K
- LUT cells: 7,680 ([BEAUTIFUL_PROVISIONAL - 3.3% utilization estimate awaiting synthesis verification])
- Flip-flops: 7,680 ([BEAUTIFUL_PROVISIONAL - 1.3% utilization estimate awaiting synthesis verification])
- Block RAM: 128KB ([BEAUTIFUL_PROVISIONAL - 6.3% utilization estimate awaiting synthesis verification])
- DSP slices: 8 ([BEAUTIFUL_PROVISIONAL - 0% utilization estimate awaiting synthesis verification])
- Clock: 50 MHz
Performance:
- Latency: [BEAUTIFUL_PROVISIONAL - 160ns estimate awaiting hardware measurement]
- Throughput: [BEAUTIFUL_PROVISIONAL - 6.25M ops/sec estimate awaiting hardware measurement]
Modules Implemented:
- Q16.16 arithmetic (add, mul, div, compare)
- OEPI calculator (5 multiplications, 4 additions)
- OEPI threshold classifier (low/medium/critical)
- Scalar state machine (16 states)
- Amplitude update
- Profile collapse selector
- Top-level integration
Lean Integration Status
Source files:
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/MorphicScalar.lean- Morphic scalar types and operations0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/OEPI.lean- OEPI calculation and thresholds0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/OriginProtocol.lean- Lineage memory and inheritance0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/FPGAExtraction.lean- FPGA extraction specification
AGENTS.md Compliance:
- ✅ Lean is source of truth
- ✅ Verilog is extraction target only
- ✅ No logic in Verilog without Lean theorem
- ✅ Q16.16 fixed-point (no Float)
- ✅ PascalCase files, camelCase functions
- ⚠️ Theorems marked as
sorry(incomplete)
Incomplete Proofs:
All theorems in FPGAExtraction.lean are marked as sorry:
ice40SufficientResources- Needs proof that 250/7680 < 100%oepiLinearComplexity- Needs proof of O(1) complexityfiniteStateMachineStates- Needs proof of exactly 16 states
Compatibility with Existing FPGA Work
Existing files:
docs/FPGA_WARDEN_NODE_SPEC.md- AMMR architecture specificationhardware/nii_surface_driver.v- NII surface driver with Q16.16out/verilog/tangnano9k_topology_router.v- TangNano9K router
Integration points:
- Shared Q16.16 arithmetic
- Complementary functionality (AMMR phase accumulation + scalar state machine)
- Same target hardware (Lattice iCE40 HX8K/ECP5)
- OEPI can feed into Warden safety valves
- Scalar state can modulate AMMR accumulation
Review Checklist
Code Review
- Verilog syntax verification
- Q16.16 arithmetic correctness
- State machine completeness
- OEPI calculation accuracy
- Resource utilization accuracy
Mathematical Review
- OEPI weight sum correctness (0.25+0.25+0.20+0.15+0.15 = 1.0)
- Threshold values (70, 95)合理性
- Fixed-point precision analysis
- Overflow/underflow handling
Hardware Review
- Resource estimates vs actual synthesis
- Timing analysis
- Clock domain crossing
- Power consumption estimate
Lean Verification
- Complete
sorryproofs in FPGAExtraction.lean - Complete
sorryproofs in MorphicScalar.lean - Complete
sorryproofs in OEPI.lean - Complete
sorryproofs in OriginProtocol.lean - Lake build passes
Integration Review
- Compatibility with FPGA Warden Node
- Interface compatibility
- Shared resource usage
- Combined resource utilization
Decision Required
Please specify which review approach to proceed with:
- Lean Theorem Verification - Complete mathematical proofs
- Verilog Simulation - Run testbench with simulator
- Synthesis Check - Test with Yosys for target hardware
- Formal Verification - Model checking against spec
- All of the above - Comprehensive review
Response format: "Proceed with [Option X]" or specify custom approach