- Prover-Integrated Orchestration Layers (L0-L3): Goedel-Prover-V2 watchdog, BFS-Prover-V2 swarm consensus, bf4prover topology adaptation - FAMM Verilator benchmark: uniform vs preshaped delay comparison (4.4x speedup) - Swarm topological device prober: 11 agents probing traces, caps, delays, errors, vias, PDN - Spec sheet puller: 10 components with key params and topological relevance - Virtual FPGA system tests: 6/6 passed, 134K ops/s throughput - Fixed merge conflicts in AI-Newton test_experiment.ipynb
5.1 KiB
F01-F12 Verification Protocol
Layer 1: Mathematical Verification (Wolfram Alpha)
Every equation verified against Wolfram Alpha:
Input: 121.567 * 65536
Wolfram: 7,967,421.952
Rounded: 7,967,422
Q16.16: 0x0079.9120
Required for each F01-F12:
- Closed-form solution where available
- Numerical test with 3+ input sets
- Edge cases (zero, infinity, singularities)
- Document Wolfram query in comment
Layer 2: Computational Verification (Lean 4)
Every def requires:
def encodeWavelength (λ : Q16_16) : Q16_16 := ...
#eval encodeWavelength (Q16_16.ofFloat 121.567)
-- Expected: 0x0079.9120
-- Wolfram verified: 121.567 * 65536 = 7,967,422
Every def requires theorem:
theorem encodeWavelength_total (λ : Q16_16) :
∃ result, encodeWavelength λ = result := by
simp [encodeWavelength]
Build must pass:
cd 0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics && lake build
Layer 3: Determinism Verification
Test: Same inputs → Same outputs (always)
def test_determinism():
for i in range(1000):
result = f01_encode(121.567)
assert result == 0x0079.9120
Failure modes:
- Non-deterministic: Reject
- Undefined behavior: Reject
- Platform-dependent: Reject
Layer 4: Symbolic Stripping Verification
Test: Remove all semantic content, verify computation
Original: encode_hydrogen_wavelength(λ)
Stripped: N_7 = floor(N_0 * 65536 + 32768) / 65536
Test: N_0 = 121.567 → N_7 = 0x0079.9120
Pass: Computation identical with/without names
Required: 100% pass rate on adversarial stripping test.
Layer 5: Property-Based Testing
QuickCheck-style random testing:
theorem encode_roundtrip (λ : Q16_16) (h : λ ≥ 0) :
|decode (encode λ) - λ| < 0.0001 := by
-- Property: encode then decode ≈ original
Test properties:
- Roundtrip (encode→decode ≈ original)
- Monotonicity (x < y → f(x) < f(y))
- Boundedness (output in valid range)
- Idempotence (f(f(x)) = f(x) where applicable)
Layer 6: Cross-Implementation Verification
Two independent implementations:
- Lean 4 (canonical):
0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics/ - Python (reference):
4-Infrastructure/shim/validation/
Verify bit-identical outputs:
def test_cross_impl():
for input_val in test_vectors:
lean_result = lean_call(input_val)
py_result = python_call(input_val)
assert lean_result == py_result # Bit-identical
Layer 7: Statistical Verification (6.5σ)
For claims with statistical component:
Claim: Compression ratio > baseline
Test: 1000 random inputs
Mean: μ, Std: σ
Achieved: x = 6.5σ above baseline?
Required: Yes for 6.5σ claim
Standard: 6.5σ = 99.999999992% confidence
Minimum: 5σ = 99.9999427% confidence
Below 5σ: REJECT
Verification Checklist per FXX
| Layer | Test | Pass Criteria | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolfram Alpha | 3+ numerical cases verified | ☐ |
| 2 | Lean #eval | All public functions have #eval | ☐ |
| 3 | Totality theorem | Every def has totality proof |
☐ |
| 4 | Determinism | 1000 iterations, identical outputs | ☐ |
| 5 | Symbolic stripping | Passes adversarial test | ☐ |
| 6 | Property tests | Roundtrip, monotonicity, bounds | ☐ |
| 7 | Cross-impl | Bit-identical with Python shim | ☐ |
| 8 | Statistical | 6.5σ where applicable | ☐ |
| 9 | Lake build | lake build passes |
☐ |
| 10 | No sorry | Zero sorry in code |
☐ |
All 10 must pass for VALIDATED status.
Automated Verification Script
#!/bin/bash
# verify_fxx.sh
FXX=$1
echo "Verifying $FXX..."
# Layer 2: Lean build
cd 0-Core-Formalism/lean/Semantics
if ! lake build; then
echo "FAIL: lake build"
exit 1
fi
# Layer 4: Adversarial stripping
if ! python3 4-Infrastructure/shim/adversarial_symbolic_stripping.py --test $FXX; then
echo "FAIL: symbolic stripping"
exit 1
fi
# Layer 6: Cross-implementation
if ! python3 4-Infrastructure/shim/cross_verify.py --lean $FXX; then
echo "FAIL: cross-implementation"
exit 1
fi
echo "PASS: $FXX verified"
Best Verification: Compositional
Verify components, compose to system:
F01 verified + F02 verified + ... + F12 verified
↓
Compose: F01∘F02∘...∘F12
↓
Verify composition: Master equation
Do not: Verify only final output
Do: Verify each FXX independently, then verify composition
Summary
Best verification = 10-layer compositional checking:
- Wolfram Alpha (math)
- Lean #eval (compute)
- Totality theorems (total functions)
- Determinism (1000 iterations)
- Symbolic stripping (no semantic deps)
- Property-based (random testing)
- Cross-implementation (bit-identical)
- Statistical (6.5σ)
- Lake build (compiles)
- No sorry (proven correct)
10/10 required for publication.
Current F01-F12 status: 0/10
Document ID: VERIFICATION-PROTOCOL-2026-05-06
Standard: 10-layer compositional verification
Target: 100% pass rate for all F01-F12
Current: 0% — blocked on F01-F12 formalization