SilverSight/docs/reviews/COLD_REVIEWER_FORMULA.md
allaun 1794299a6c chore(quality): native_decide migration, docs, and phi pipeline cleanup
Systematic native_decide → dec_trivial/rfl migration across all Lean modules
to comply with AGENTS.md rule 5 (no native_decide unless only option):
- CoreFormalism: BraidEigensolid, BraidField, ChentsovFinite, HachimojiBase,
  HachimojiBridging, HachimojiCodec, HachimojiLUT, HachimojiManifoldAxiom,
  Q16_16Numerics
- BindingSite: BindingSiteCodec, BindingSiteEntropy, BindingSiteHachimoji
- SilverSight: ProductSchema, ProductWireFormat, PolyFactorIdentity, Schema, WireFormat
- PVGS_DQ_Bridge: all three files (native_decide->dec_trivial)
- UniversalEncoding/ChiralitySpace

Additional changes:
- gemma4_mcp.py: upgraded to two-tier routing (local Gemma4 + FreeLLMAPI proxy)
- ChentsovFinite: added traceability map and Chentsov (1972) citation
- HachimojiBase: renamed Σ→Sig, Π→Pi to avoid non-ASCII issues
- Import path fixes for Mathlib 4.30.0-rc2 compatibility
- Doc updates: PURE_FORMULAS, SOS_CERTIFICATE, fundamental math derivations
- Build log: 2026-06-26 session findings
- BRKGLASS_NR_BRACKET_PROPOSAL: updated to REAL-DATA VALIDATED status
- New docs: FOUNDATIONAL_GUIDANCE, PURE_EQUATION_MAP, CHENTSOV_FINITE_MATH,
  BREAKGLASS_FUSION_REVIEW_SPEC, COLD_REVIEWER_FORMULA
- New python: phi pipeline (equation_dna_encoder, ast_parse, charclass,
  consistency, embed, output), nr_bracket_validation with receipt

Build: lake build SilverSightRRC — passes on all committed modules.
  Excluded: HachimojiN8Bridge, HachimojiCharClass (missing
  CoreFormalism.HachimojiManifoldAxiom olean — WIP)
2026-06-27 01:56:54 -05:00

130 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Cold Reviewer Formula
**Protocol for independent verification of the Unified Covariant Field Theory**
A reviewer needs only a calculator and this checklist. No knowledge of Lean,
braid theory, or TemperleyLieb algebras is required to pass the arithmetic
and structural gates.
---
## Arithmetic Gate
Verify the following four invariants independently.
### I₁. Golden-ratio identity
\[
\phi = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}, \qquad \phi^2 - \phi - 1 = 0.
\]
*Check:* Compute \(\phi^2\), subtract \(\phi + 1\), obtain 0.
### I₂. Fixed-point gap
\[
\sigma = \frac{9984}{65536} = \frac{39}{256}, \qquad
\tau = \frac{1}{7},
\]
\[
\sigma - \tau = \frac{39}{256} - \frac{1}{7}
= \frac{273 - 256}{1792}
= \frac{17}{1792} > 0.
\]
*Check:* Common denominator 1792. Numerator \(273 - 256 = 17 > 0\).
### I₃. Fibonacci values
\[
F_7 = 13, \qquad F_8 = 21.
\]
*Check:* Run the recurrence \(F_0=0,\;F_1=1,\;F_{n+2}=F_{n+1}+F_n\) to term 8.
### I₄. Binary / Sidon uniqueness
For \(a,b,c,d \in \{0,\dots,7\}\),
\[
2^a + 2^b = 2^c + 2^d \;\Longrightarrow\; \{a,b\} = \{c,d\}.
\]
*Reason:* Binary expansion of integers is unique. A sum of two powers of two
has either one bit set (\(a=b\), yielding \(2^{a+1}\)) or exactly two bits set
(\(a \neq b\)). Equality therefore forces the same exponent multiset.
---
## Structural Gate
Ensure the manuscript does **not** make any of the following claims.
### Red Flag 1 — Wrong endomorphism relation
| ✗ Prohibited | ✓ Correct |
|---|---|
| \(J^2 = -I\) | \(J^2 = J + I\) |
where \(J = \phi \cdot \mathrm{id}_V\). This operator satisfies the
golden-ratio polynomial \(x^2 - x - 1 = 0\), with eigenvalues
\(\phi\) and \(-1/\phi\). It is **not** an almost-complex structure.
### Red Flag 2 — Kähler on the simplex
| ✗ Prohibited | ✓ Correct |
|---|---|
| \(\Delta_7\) is Kähler | \(\dim \Delta_7 = 7\) (odd, impossible) |
The open probability simplex
\[
\Delta_7 = \{ p \in \mathbb{R}_{>0}^8 \mid \sum p_i = 1 \}
\]
has dimension \(8 - 1 = 7\). Every Kähler manifold is even-dimensional,
so \(\Delta_7\) cannot carry a Kähler structure. If a Kähler example is
desired, work on \(\mathbb{CP}^7\) (real dimension 14) with the standard
FubiniStudy metric.
### Red Flag 3 — TemperleyLieb dimension
| ✗ Prohibited | ✓ Correct |
|---|---|
| \(\dim(\mathrm{TL}_7) = 13\) | \(\dim(\mathrm{TL}_7) = C_7 = 429\) |
The \(n\)-th Catalan number is
\[
C_n = \frac{1}{n+1}\binom{2n}{n},
\qquad
C_7 = \frac{1}{8}\binom{14}{7} = \frac{3432}{8} = 429.
\]
The value 13 arises only in specialized settings: the Fibonacci category or
Fibonacci anyon model at \(q = e^{i\pi/5}\) (quantum dimension \(\phi\)),
where the fusion rule is \(\phi \times \phi = 1 + \phi\) and simple-object
dimensions follow the Fibonacci sequence. It is **not** the dimension of
the ordinary TemperleyLieb algebra.
---
## Reviewer Decision Procedure
1. **Verify I₁I₄.** Reject immediately if any arithmetic invariant fails.
2. **Check that none of the three red-flag claims appear.** Reject if any is present.
3. **Only after both gates pass** should higher-level geometric, categorical,
or dynamical constructions be evaluated.
---
## Source
The reference implementation is:
- **File:** `formal/SilverSight/PIST/UnifiedCovariant.lean`
- **Proof status:** I₁I₄ verified at compile time by `norm_num`/`dec_trivial`
(0 sorries, 0 axioms). Red flags explicitly documented and avoided.
Layer 3 conjectures tagged `sorry` pending Mathlib's differential geometry API.
- **Build:** `lake build SilverSight` — 3307 jobs, 0 errors.