mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/SilverSight.git
synced 2026-08-12 16:20:33 +00:00
Includes: - n-dimensional generic modules (BraidStateN, MatrixN, SpectralN, ClassifyN, FisherRigidityN, FixedPointBridge) - Feasible Set Theorem proofs + QUBO relaxation - Anti-smuggle protocol (seedlock, mutation testing, cross_validate, qc_flag, symbol verification) - Q16_16 bridge with quad matrix representation - Infrastructure scripts (entry gate, determinism checks) - Test suites for Lean modules, scripts, and QUBO pipeline - FixedPoint migration and HachimojiN8 updates - Documentation updates (ARCHITECTURE, GLOSSARY, DOCUMENT_SETS) - QUBO conflict sweep and FSR validation - GitHub Actions anti-smuggle workflow Build: 3307 jobs, 0 errors
133 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
133 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
# Collective Intelligence Optimization Theorem — Formal Framework
|
||
|
||
**Date:** 2026-06-29
|
||
**Based on:** Fugu's collective intelligence insight, formalized in Lean 4
|
||
**Connection:** Dual quaternion χ ratio as geometric alignment measure
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Theorem 1: Capability Space Partition
|
||
|
||
Let $\mathcal{M} = \{M_1, \dots, M_n\}$ be models with capability vectors $c_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$.
|
||
Partition capability space into $k$ orthogonal sectors $\mathcal{S}_1, \dots, \mathcal{S}_k$.
|
||
For task $t$ with requirement $r_t \in \mathbb{R}^d$:
|
||
|
||
$$\max_{M \in \mathcal{M}} \langle c_M, r_t \rangle \leq \sum_{j=1}^k \max_{M \in \mathcal{M} \cap \mathcal{S}_j} \langle c_M, r_t^{(j)} \rangle$$
|
||
|
||
**Prediction:** Optimal single model ≤ sum of optimal sector specialists.
|
||
|
||
## Theorem 2: Orchestration Advantage
|
||
|
||
$$\Delta_{\text{orch}} \geq \sum_{j=1}^k \left( \max_{M \in \mathcal{S}_j} \langle c_M, r_t^{(j)} \rangle - \langle c_{M^*}, r_t \rangle \right)$$
|
||
|
||
**Prediction:** Orchestration advantage ≥ sum of performance gaps between sector specialists and best generalist.
|
||
|
||
## Theorem 3: Cost-Performance Tradeoff
|
||
|
||
For budget $B$, optimal set $S^*(B) = \arg\max_{S \subseteq \mathcal{M}, C(S) \leq B} P(S)$.
|
||
Greedy algorithm achieves $\geq 1 - 1/e \approx 63\%$ of optimal.
|
||
|
||
## Theorem 4: Dynamic Adaptation Inequality
|
||
|
||
$$\mathbb{E}[P_{t+1}(S_{t+1})] \geq \mathbb{E}[P_t(S_t)] + \alpha \cdot \text{Var}(P_t(S_t))$$
|
||
|
||
**Prediction:** Adaptive orchestrators improve proportionally to performance variance.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Connection to Dual Quaternion χ
|
||
|
||
The χ ratio is geometric alignment in capability space:
|
||
|
||
| Lean Structure | Dual Quaternion | Purpose |
|
||
|---------------|-----------------|---------|
|
||
| `Capability` | Real part (compressive) | H, I, C, quality |
|
||
| `Task.requirements` | Dual part (anti-compressive) | R, L, noise, cost |
|
||
| `alignment` | χ = real² / (real² + dual²) | Geometric alignment |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Empirical Predictions (Falsifiable)
|
||
|
||
1. Coding tasks: optimal set always includes a model with χ > 0.8 for `code_generation`
|
||
2. 3-model ensemble improvement bounded by $1 + \sqrt{2}$ (information-theoretic)
|
||
3. For tasks requiring $\geq 3$ sectors, greedy achieves $\geq 75\%$ of optimal
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Lean Formalization Path
|
||
|
||
| Module | Content | Status |
|
||
|--------|---------|--------|
|
||
| `Semantics.CollectiveIntelligence.lean` | Structures, theorems, bounds | 🔴 NOT STARTED |
|
||
| `model_panel.py` | Empirical validation harness | ✅ EXISTS |
|
||
| `dual_quat_model_selector.py` | Dual quaternion selection | ✅ EXISTS |
|
||
|
||
**Target:** `formal/SilverSight/CollectiveIntelligence/` in SilverSight.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Transparent Cost Framework — No Hidden Fees
|
||
|
||
### Theorem 0: Cost Transparency Axiom
|
||
|
||
For any model $M_i$ and task $T$, the cost $C(M_i, T)$ must be expressible as:
|
||
|
||
$$C(M_i, T) = c_{\text{in}} \cdot |I| + c_{\text{out}} \cdot |O| + c_{\text{fixed}}$$
|
||
|
||
- $c_{\text{in}}$ = known input token cost (published API rate)
|
||
- $c_{\text{out}}$ = known output token cost (published API rate)
|
||
- $|I|, |O|$ = measurable input/output token counts
|
||
- $c_{\text{fixed}}$ = known fixed overhead (zero if none)
|
||
|
||
No hidden terms. No per-call multipliers. No surprise fees.
|
||
|
||
### Theorem 1: Cost-Performance Pareto Frontier
|
||
|
||
For any budget $B$, the optimal set $S^*(B)$ lies on the Pareto frontier:
|
||
- $C(S^*(B)) \leq B$ (never exceeds budget)
|
||
- No model outside the set is both cheaper AND better than one inside
|
||
|
||
### Theorem 2: Economies of Scale Bound
|
||
|
||
$$\frac{P(S)}{C(S)} \leq \max_i \frac{p_i}{c_i}$$
|
||
|
||
Ensemble's cost-performance ratio never exceeds the best individual model's ratio. **No magical "ensemble synergy" that makes multi-model cheaper per unit performance.**
|
||
|
||
### Theorem 3: Cost Synergies Forbidden
|
||
|
||
Coordination cost is explicit and bounded:
|
||
|
||
$$C(\{M_1, M_2\}, T) = C(M_1, T) + C(M_2, T) + C_{\text{coord}}$$
|
||
|
||
where $0 \leq C_{\text{coord}} \leq 0.10$ (hard bound, no hidden routing fees).
|
||
|
||
### Explicit Cost Models
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
COST_MODELS = {
|
||
"deepseek-v4-pro": {"in": 0.27, "out": 1.10, "fixed": 0.0},
|
||
"claude-opus": {"in": 15.0, "out": 75.0, "fixed": 0.0},
|
||
"gpt-5.5": {"in": 10.0, "out": 30.0, "fixed": 0.0},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
COORDINATION_COST = {
|
||
"single": 0.0, "pair": 0.01, "multi": 0.02, "max": 0.10
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Comparison: Fugu (Hidden) vs This Framework (Explicit)
|
||
|
||
| Aspect | Fugu | This Framework |
|
||
|--------|------|---------------|
|
||
| Model costs | Proprietary | Published API rates |
|
||
| Routing fees | Hidden | Fixed $0.01–0.02 |
|
||
| Coordination overhead | Hidden | ≤ 10% (theorem) |
|
||
| Token counting | Opaque | Explicit in/out |
|
||
| Budget enforcement | "Sakana manages this" | Mathematical proof |
|
||
|
||
### Falsifiable Cost Predictions
|
||
|
||
1. Optimal set cost within 5% of budget when admissible sets exist
|
||
2. Coordination cost ≤ 10% of total for up to 8 models
|
||
3. Single-model is cost-optimal when best model's P/C ratio > 2× second-best
|