SilverSight/.openresearch/artifacts/EVAL_v3.md
allaun 8265cfc3ae fix(adversarial): EPS fix exposed v2/v3 sofa coloring as false-edge artifact
- EPS 0.05 -> 1e-5 (adversarial review finding: 5 orders too wide)
- v2 results (χ up to 24, q=1 phase boundary) were false-edge artifacts
- v3 with corrected EPS: max χ=3 across all (shape,n,q) configurations
- de Grey 1581-vertex graph constructs correctly (Hoffman bound χ≥3)
- Gerver-like/hammersley shapes repaired (self-intersection, gaps, q-param)

Build: lake build CoreFormalism.CRTSidon (3297 jobs, 0 errors)
2026-07-04 02:58:14 -05:00

1.1 KiB

Sidon-Sofa Coloring v3: Fine q-sweep — Negative Result

Finding

With the corrected EPS tolerance (1e-5 instead of 0.05), the sofa shape conflict graphs are nearly empty. The earlier results (χ up to 24, visible q=1 phase boundary) were artifacts of the too-wide tolerance.

Data

χ Count %
1 106 57%
2 80 43%
3 1 0.5%

Max χ across all (shape, n, q) configurations: 3.

What happened

  • Adversarial review identified EPS=0.05 was unjustified (5 orders too wide)
  • At EPS=1e-5, the sofa shapes don't produce unit-distance conflicts dense enough to create non-trivial chromatic numbers
  • The q=1 phase boundary was a false-edge artifact

Conclusion

The current shape parameterization does not produce meaningful unit-distance conflict graphs at a mathematically justified tolerance. Future work should redesign the shapes or accept the sparse result.

Files

  • sidon_sofa_coloring_v3.py — fine q-sweep script (repaired)
  • sidon_sofa_coloring_v2.py — base script (EPS fixed)
  • hn_hoffman_bound.py — de Grey graph (verified, 1581 vertices)