SilverSight/docs/research/SLOS_SIDON_VERIFICATION_RECEIPT.md
allaun f9b3df0803 feat(lean): modular Sidon preservation theorem + meta-review fixes
- CRTSidon.lean: full proof of sidon_preserved_mod (matches Python
  CRT-reconstructed mod-M check). Uses Bezout via Nat.gcdA/Nat.gcdB
  for CRT injectivity. 0 sorries.
- BraidEigensolid.lean/GoldenSpiral.lean: fix golden centering
  constant (40560->40504, 0.14% relative error)
- AGENTS.md: flag StrandCapacityBound triviality, add CRTSidon status
- CITATION.cff: add Elsasser(1946) toroidal/poloidal prior art
- SLOS receipt: add classical-simulation disclaimer
- sidon_preservation_creation.md: mark creation theorem unformalized
- autoresearch: containerized via runpod/autoresearch base image
  (silver-autoproof:latest), systemd service created
- LeanCopilotFill.lean: updated for new CRTSidon API

Build: 3297 jobs, 0 errors (lake build CoreFormalism.CRTSidon)
2026-07-04 01:05:15 -05:00

3.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

SLOS Sidon Verification Receipt

Status: VERIFIED — all claims backed by local SLOS simulation and exact tensor network Date: 2026-07-03 System: Provider-nixos (neon-rs1000), Perceval v1.2.4, quimb v1.14.0 Script: scripts/perceval_slos_verify.py Artifacts: .openresearch/artifacts/slos_computation_dag.json (192 nodes, 96 edges)


Core Claim

Eigenvalue product concentration predicts SLOS output concentration ordering for Sidon vs non-Sidon label sets, verified across K=1..4 and 12 test cases.

Test Cases (12 label sets, 4 photon numbers = 48 test points)

Category Label sets Sizes
Sidon powers of 2 sidon_pow2, sidon_pow7, sidon_pow8 4, 7, 8
Sidon constructions sidon_h8, sidon_h16, sidon_s6, sidon_s7 4, 5, 6, 7
Non-Sidon consecutive nonsidon_seq, nonsidon_dense6, nonsidon_dense7 4, 6, 7
Prime-based primes_s7, primes_s8 7, 8

Spearman Rank Correlations

Test K=1 K=2 K=3 K=4
Products → SLOS KL ρ = -0.846 ρ = -0.880 ρ = -0.930 ρ = -0.930
SLOS ↔ Tensor (exact) ρ = -0.944 ρ = -0.937 ρ = -0.979 N/A (K>3)

All correlations are negative: lower eigenvalue product distinct_ratio → higher SLOS KL divergence from uniform (more concentrated output). Correlation strengthens with K.

Key Comparisons (same-size sets, K=2)

Size Sidon KL Non-Sidon KL Ratio
4 sidon_pow2 1.13 nonsidon_seq 0.50 2.3×
4 sidon_h8 0.91 nonsidon_seq 0.50 1.8×
6 sidon_s6 1.95 nonsidon_dense6 0.93 2.1×
7 sidon_pow7 2.94 nonsidon_dense7 1.92 1.5×
7 primes_s7 2.12 nonsidon_dense7 1.92 1.1×
8 sidon_pow8 3.30 nonsidon_dense7 1.92 1.7×

Method Agreement

The Spearman ρ = -0.979 between SLOS (100k-shot sampling) and exact tensor network entropy at K=3 confirms that the SLOS sampling noise is negligible — the two methods produce nearly identical orderings. This is a cross-method validation: the result is not an artifact of Perceval's specific SLOS implementation.

DAG Structure

192 nodes recording the full computation graph:

  • 48 eigenvalue product nodes (12 sets × 4 K values)
  • 48 SLOS circuit nodes
  • 48 SLOS result nodes (100k shots each)
  • 48 comparison nodes (Spearman + tensor cross-validation)

Each node is individually checkpointed. Resume with --resume after interruption.

claim_boundary

slos-sidon-verification:spearman-correlation-cross-method

This receipt is bounded to the claim that eigenvalue product distinct_ratio predicts SLOS concentration ordering across the tested label sets and photon numbers. It does not claim universality beyond the 12 test cases, nor does it claim physical realizability on quantum hardware.

Important caveat: SLOS (Strong Linear Optical Simulation) is Perceval's classical simulator of a photonic quantum system. The "cross-method validation" (ρ = -0.979) compares two classical computations (SLOS sampling and exact tensor network entropy), not theory vs. physical experiment. This receipt verifies computational consistency, not physical correctness.