- 6 enhancement proposals with priority ranking - Mapping between sprint results and Lean formalism - PIST.Spectral, Torus winding, PIST field, Eigensolid, TreeBraid, Octagonal-Fisher
3.7 KiB
Enhancement: PIST + Braid Integration with Sprint Results
1. PIST.Spectral Bridge (Lean ↔ Python)
The Lean computeSpectral operates on 8x8 Int matrices in Q16_16 fixed-point.
The sprint's compute_spectral_properties uses scipy.sparse.eigsh on the Laplacian.
Integration: Add a Python→Lean bridge that:
- Takes the sprint's 8x8 spectral coefficient matrix (from
pack_eigenvalues) - Converts to Q16_16 fixed-point representation
- Runs through
SilverSight.PIST.Spectral.computeSpectral - Compares: Python float gap vs Lean Q16_16 gap
This validates that the floating-point spectral analysis is consistent with fixed-point arithmetic — critical for embedded/ESP32 deployment.
2. Golden Centering ↔ Φ-Corkscrew
BraidEigensolid.goldenCentering = 40560 in Q16_16 = φ⁻¹ ≈ 0.618896.
The Φ-corkscrew uses ψ = 2π/φ² where φ² = φ + 1.
Integration: Add a phiTorusWinding function that:
- Computes the spiral index n from spectral coefficients
- Maps n → TorusWinding counts (a,b) via: a = n mod φ-step, b = floor(n/φ-step)
- Where φ-step = round(1/φ⁻¹) = round(φ) = 2
The torus carrier T² gives the braid a surface to live on — the spiral index becomes a winding number around the two fundamental cycles.
3. BraidField PIST ↔ 4-Mode Sprint Receipt
The PIST operator has 4 areas: B (burden), G (geometry), A (adaptation), P (protection).
The sprint produces 4 receipts (one per mode) with:
- executionTimeMs → B (burden)
- dominantEigenvalue + spectralGap → G (geometry)
- mode selection logic → A (adaptation)
- OOM guards + checks_passed → P (protection)
Integration: Add sprint_to_pist_field that computes the PIST field from
sprint results and compares across modes. If all 4 modes produce the same PIST
field (within Q16_16 tolerance), the cross-mode agreement is structurally sound.
4. BraidSpherionBridge ↔ Cross-Mode Agreement
Proven theorem: braidCross on (i,j) ↔ Mountain.merge for corresponding pair
Integration: The 4 execution modes (ESP32, photonic, quantum, tensor) are
analogous to 4 braid strand pairs. Cross-mode agreement means all 4 pairs
converge to the same eigensolid. The receipt_correspondence theorem gives
formal backing to the "all modes agree" check.
5. TreeBraid ↔ Resumable DAG
BraidField.rgFlow = fold of betaStep over spike train = tree braid.
Mountain.merge = tree node merge. MMR.append = tree rebalancing.
Integration: The resumable DAG's chunked Ryser with manifold coordinate
transforms IS rgFlow in disguise. Each chunk is a spike; the DAG checkpoint
is the MMR state; the manifold coordinate transform is the PIST field update.
6. Octagonal Norm ↔ Fisher-Rao Metric
BraidBracket.PhaseVec.normApprox = max(|x|,|y|) + 3/8·min(|x|,|y|)
This is a norm on the phase space. The Fisher-Rao metric on Δ₇ maps to S⁷ via √p. The octagonal norm could be a Finsler metric on the same space.
Integration: Show that the octagonal norm upper-bounds the Fisher-Rao distance for the 8-strand braid state embedded in Δ₇. This connects the braid formalism to Chentsov's theorem.
Implementation Priority
| Priority | Enhancement | Files Changed | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | PIST.Spectral bridge (Python→Lean) | PIST/Spectral.lean + Python |
Medium |
| P0 | Golden centering torus winding | BraidEigensolid.lean + Python |
Low |
| P1 | PIST field from sprint receipt | BraidField.lean + Python |
Medium |
| P1 | Cross-mode as eigensolid convergence | BraidSpherionBridge.lean |
Low |
| P2 | TreeBraid ↔ Resumable DAG mapping | New doc + Python | Medium |
| P2 | Octagonal norm ↔ Fisher-Rao bound | New Lean proof | High |