mirror of
https://github.com/allaunthefox/SilverSight.git
synced 2026-08-09 02:45:46 +00:00
48 test points across K=1..4 and 12 label sets (Sidon power sets, Sidon constructions, dense non-Sidon, prime-based). Results: K=1: ρ=-0.85 (products→SLOS), ρ=-0.94 (SLOS↔tensor) K=2: ρ=-0.88 (products→SLOS), ρ=-0.94 (SLOS↔tensor) K=3: ρ=-0.93 (products→SLOS), ρ=-0.98 (SLOS↔tensor) K=4: ρ=-0.93 (products→SLOS), tensor N/A (K>3) Key: all Spearman correlations are negative and strengthen with K. Sidon sets produce 1.5-2.3× higher KL divergence than same-size non-Sidon. Primes are intermediate: partially Sidon-like but weaker. DAG: 192 nodes, 96 edges, all individually checkpointed for resume. Resume with: python3 scripts/perceval_slos_verify.py --resume Receipt: docs/research/SLOS_SIDON_VERIFICATION_RECEIPT.md Build: N/A (Python/perceval verification, no Lean build)
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
EVAL.md — SLOS Eigenvalue Product Verification
Mode: Local SLOS Overall: FAIL Checks: 8 total, 7 PASS, 1 FAIL DAG nodes: 192 DAG report: /home/allaun/SilverSight/.openresearch/artifacts/slos_computation_dag.md
Results
| Test | Claim | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | K=1: Spearman ρ=-0.846 (n=12), lower distinct_ratio→higher KL CONFIRME | PASS |
| T1 | K=1: SLOS vs tensor ρ=-0.944 (n=12), METHODS AGREE on ordering | PASS |
| T1 | K=2: Spearman ρ=-0.880 (n=12), lower distinct_ratio→higher KL CONFIRME | PASS |
| T1 | K=2: SLOS vs tensor ρ=-0.937 (n=12), METHODS AGREE on ordering | PASS |
| T1 | K=3: Spearman ρ=-0.930 (n=12), lower distinct_ratio→higher KL CONFIRME | PASS |
| T1 | K=3: SLOS vs tensor ρ=-0.979 (n=12), METHODS AGREE on ordering | PASS |
| T1 | K=4: Spearman ρ=-0.930 (n=12), lower distinct_ratio→higher KL CONFIRME | PASS |
| T1 | K=4: insufficient data for tensor vs SLOS | FAIL |
Computation DAG
See: /home/allaun/SilverSight/.openresearch/artifacts/slos_computation_dag.md
Checkpoints
See: /home/allaun/SilverSight/.openresearch/artifacts/slos_checkpoints/