3.4 KiB
Problem 2.8 — Exact Hypergeometric Tail Closure
Status: exact proof, adversarially audited Date: July 2026
For every official column j=1,2,3,4, the authoritative recurrence
satisfies the official orientation
[ \boxed{\displaystyle \lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{P_{N,j}}{Q_{N,j}} =\frac{\sqrt{10005}}{\pi}}. ]
Its reciprocal consequence is
[ \lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{Q_{N,j}}{P_{N,j}} =\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{10005}}. ]
Exact closure
The proof closes the former connection-functional gap through:
- the fully displayed rational deformation
M_N(x)=\mathcal M(2N+3,x); - a nonterminating
{}_4F_3tail withM_Nk_{N+1}=k_N; - four denominator-cleared Ore factorizations, with no division or remainder command;
- a rank-one discrete-valuation induction giving the all-
NPadé divisibility pattern; - an exact terminating adjoint
{}_4F_3, proved by a matrix-induced scalar step and base/generic/top coefficient induction; - positivity at
z_0=-1/53360^3and a Cauchy bound with [ \beta= \frac{3125}{1307443596565949700399927} <4\cdot10^{-19}; ] - the Chudnovsky CM value
\Phi(x_0)=\sqrt{10005}/\pi; - an explicit stable-graph contraction constructing the dominant functional and proving eventual nonvanishing in all four columns.
The proof is structural and does not infer equality from the earlier
10^{-1052} numerical enclosure.
Equation-only audit repairs
The repaired release removes:
- Ore
quo_remcalls from the proof path; - ODE-normalization uniqueness;
- Birkhoff–Poincaré delegation;
- irreducibility and polynomial-GCD decisions;
- a false negative-exponent norm inequality;
- implicit maximum-principle and denominator-nonvanishing hypotheses;
- reliance on stored PASS transcripts.
The mandatory standard-library checkers verify the full differential gauge, base horizontal row, matrix-to-scalar bridge, terminating induction, balanced limit, characteristic polynomial, root-separation inequalities, and positive exterior-root eigenvector coordinates.
Trust boundary
The classical Chudnovsky formula is the sole imported problem-specific theorem and is cited precisely to a complete modular/CM derivation. Standard foundational complex- and linear-analysis results are used with their hypotheses displayed. The package therefore claims a self-contained recurrence proof relative to that explicit theorem—not an axiom-free reconstruction of all of complex analysis or CM theory.
Authoritative artifacts
docs/proofs/PROBLEM_28_PROOF.texdocs/proofs/PROBLEM_28_PROOF.pdfexperiments/ramanujan_28/submission/solution.texexperiments/ramanujan_28/submission/solution.pdfexperiments/ramanujan_28/submission/ADVERSARIAL_AUDIT.mdexperiments/ramanujan_28/submission/certificates/STANDALONE_EQUATION_CERTIFICATES.mdexperiments/ramanujan_28/submission/ramanujan_challenge_problem_2_8.zip
Release verification
- Mandatory dependency-free equations: PASS
- Fresh optional Wolfram cross-check: 22/22 PASS
- Independent Ore/special-function audit: PASS
- Independent convergence/all-column audit: PASS
- Independent logic/vacuity audit: PASS
- LaTeX build and warning scan: PASS
- PDF page-by-page inspection: PASS
- Clean ZIP extraction, checks, and PDF rebuild: PASS
- Clean Git-bundle clone and checks: PASS
Final SHA-256 values are recorded in Sha256.txt beside the released
artifacts.